Tdi Infrastructure
Latest Judgments
Total 414 Consumer Court Cases Against Tdi Infrastructure.
Branch Manager TDI Infrastructure Ltd. V/S Dr. Santosh Bansal W/o Subhash bansal
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate Tajinder Rathi
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 15-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2020
M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & ANR. V/S SH. R.S TOMAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate VIKAS K. BHARTI
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments : 05.02.2020Date of Decision : 10.02.2020COMPLAINT NO 33/2020In the matter of: MR. R.S. TOMAR, S/O LATE SH. K.S. TOMAR, R/O C2/C, PKT.2 FLAT NO. 20, JANAKPURI, DELHI. ...
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2020
|
Date of Upload: 04-06-2020
M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED. V/S VIJAY KUMAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate NEERAJ GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA Complaint No. 838 of 2017 Date of Institution: 22.12.2017 Date of Decision: 05.02.2020Vijay Kumar son of Sh. Jai Karan, resident of House No.277, Village and Post Office Jatheri, District Sonepat (Haryana). .&hel...
Case Number: 838
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2020
m/s tdi infrastructure Ltd. and other V/S Shiv kumar goyal
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Parvesh K. Saini
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 305
|
Date of Filing: 22-05-2019
|
Date of Upload: 31-01-2020
TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT.LTD. V/S ADITYA KALIA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SIMARPREET KAUR
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA Complaint No.432 of 2017Date of the Institution:13.07.2017Date of Decision: 17.12.2019Aditya Kalia S/o Shri Yogendera Kumar Kalia .Mrs. Namrata Kalia W/o Shri Aditya Kalia aforesaid, presently both residents of # 204...
Case Number: 432
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 29-01-2020
M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S SMT. SARIKA GUPTA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing:20.09.2019 Date of decision:26.09.2019Complaint No.294/2019Complaint No.295/2019IN THE MATTER OFC-294/2019Smt. Sarika Gupta, W/o Late Sh. Rajeev Gupta,R/o E-383, Secon...
Case Number: 294
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2019
M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S SH. VIKAS GUPTA
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.K. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: DELHI(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Hearing:20.09.2019 Date of decision:26.09.2019Complaint No.294/2019Complaint No.295/2019IN THE MATTER OFC-294/2019Smt. Sarika Gupta, W/o Late Sh. Rajeev Gupta,R/o E-383, Secon...
Case Number: 295
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2019
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2019
TDI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. V/S SMT. AJITA BISHNOI & ANR.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate D P KAUSHIK
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :16.09.2019Date of Decision :23.09.2019 COMPLAINT NO 973/2016In the matter of:1. Mrs. Ajita Bishnoi W/O Mr. Tejasvi Bishnoi Resident of A-1/245. IInd Floor, Safdarjung...
Case Number: 973
|
Date of Filing: 22-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 29-10-2019
M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S DR. KULVINDER SINGH BAHL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :06.09.2019Date of Decision : 17.09.2019 COMPLAINT NO 225/2015In the matter of:1. Dr. Kulvinder Singh Bahl R/o C-8, Sarita Vihar, New Delhi-110076 ……&he...
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 20-09-2019
M/S TDI INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S Satish Kumar
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI), ‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN,I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110002.Case No.CC.569/2015 Dated: In the matter of: Sh. Satish Kumar…ComplainantVersusTDI Infrastructure...
Case Number: 569
|
Date of Filing: 26-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 09-09-2019
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tdi Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tdi Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tdi Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.