Tata
Latest Judgments
Total 13096 Consumer Court Cases Against Tata.
M/s. tata Tele Service V/S Vivek krishna V.S
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/884/2011( Date of Filing : 09 May 2011 )1. Vivek krishna V.SBangalore 10...........Compl...
Case Number: 884
|
Date of Filing: 09-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2022
Manager Tata AIG Life Insurance Company Ltd. Mumbai V/S Vijay Seth
Life Insurance Life Insurance Tata Tata Aig Tata Aig Life Insurance Company
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 121
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 19-02-2016
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 02-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 25-02-2016
TATA AIG Life Insurance Corporation Limited V/S Mrs.Meera Julie Agnes Veigas
Life Insurance Corporation Life Insurance Corporation Life Insurance Life Insurance Tata Tata Aig
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate K.S. Nambiar
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/174/2010( Date of Filing : 15 Jun 2010 )1. Mrs.Meera Julie Agnes VeigasWo. William Edward Sequiera, Aged about 49 years, Resident of Hosakadu House, P.O. Punaroor, Talipady Vill...
Case Number: 174
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2019
TATA AIG Life Insurance Corporation Limited V/S Mrs.Meera Julie Agnes Veigas
Life Insurance Corporation Life Insurance Corporation Life Insurance Life Insurance Tata Tata Aig
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate K.S. Nambiar
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/173/2010( Date of Filing : 15 Jun 2010 )1. Mrs.Meera Julie Agnes VeigasWo. William Edward Sequiera, Aged about 49 years, Resident of Hosakadu House, P.O. Punaroor, Talipady Vill...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 12-02-2019
TATA Motors Ltd, Mumbai V/S Vinodbhai Maganbhai Desai
Court Name: Valsad
Appelant Advocate Vijay Nemchand Solanki
Respondant Advocate Apoorva N. Desai
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 19-09-2020
MANAGER TATA COMMERISIAL V/S DEVENDRA KUMAR GUTAM
Court Name: Rewa
Appelant Advocate BRIJENDRA CHATURVEDI
Respondant Advocate HANSPALANI
Case Number: 52
|
Date of Filing: 11-12-2008
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2016
M/s Tata Indicom, V/S S. Amarjit Singh
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Comp. in person
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 235 of 2011 1. S. Amarjit Singh R/o 3034, Sector 19/D, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Tata Indicom,SCO No. 232-234, Sector 34/C, Chand...
Case Number: 235
|
Date of Filing: 02-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Manager, M/s TATA Motor Ltd. V/S Gurpreet Singh
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Pawan Kumar, Adv for appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Sandeep Suri, Adv for respondents
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 490 of 2009 1. Gurpreet Singhs/o Naredner Singh, H.No. 271, Sector 46A, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Manager, M/s TATA...
Case Number: 490
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M/S. TATA MOTORS LTD. & ANR. V/S M/S. SHISHIR VASANTKUMAR SENJIT
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1520 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 13/04/2011 in Appeal No. 303/2009 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. M/S. SHISHIR VASANTKUMAR SENJITResiding at- Crystal Heights, Flat No. A-12, Survey No. 62, H...
Case Number: 1520
|
Date of Filing: 04-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 06-05-2011
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tata in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tata ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tata under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.