Tata
Latest Judgments
Total 12869 Consumer Court Cases Against Tata.
The Managing Director, TATA Housing Development Co. Ltd. V/S Dr. Debojit Dey.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Rajat Kumar Dey.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGALBHABANI BHAWAN (Gr. Floor),31, Belvedere Road, Kolkata - 700027CC NO. 128 Of 20111. Dr. Debojit Dey.S/o Sri Amarjit Dey, AC-17A, Prafulla Kanan, "Amar Prity", Kestopur, Kolkata - 700 101, Dist. North 24 Pgs............Complai...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 22-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Tata Aig janaral Insurance Company Mumbai V/S Bhagawan Jagannath Patil At Post Chilane Ta Shindkheda dis dhule
Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate K r lohar
Respondant Advocate D.A. Pingale
Complaint Case No. CC/10/3611. Bhagawan Jagannath Patil At Post Chilane Ta Shindkheda dis dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Tata Aig janaral Insurance Company Mumbai ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MR. D. D. Madake PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. C. M. Yeshirao MEMBER PRESENT...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 24-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Tata Motor's Ltd V/S Sameer Shrikant Khadkikar
Court Name: Jalna
Appelant Advocate V.V.Deshpande
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/118/20111. Sameer Shrikant KhadkikarR/O:Bhagyanager,Old JalnaJalnaMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Tata Motor's LtdAt-Chikhali,Tq-Haveli,Dist-PunePuneMaharashtra2. Sania Motor's Ltd Through Sachin MuleJalna Road,AurangabadAurangabadMaharashtra3. ...
Case Number: 118
|
Date of Filing: 21-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 125
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
M/s Tata Motors, V/S Smt. Rakesh Setia
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Raman B. Garg & Amit Sharma
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 809 of 2010 1. Smt. Rakesh SetiaR/o 897, Sector 7/b, Chandigarh, through Special Attorney Sh. J.S. Garg R/o # 11, Sector 27/A, Chandigarh. ...........
Case Number: 809
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
DR.S.MASTHAN RAO V/S 1.M/S.IDEA CELLULAR LTD,(PREVIOUSLY TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD)
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SRINIVASA RAO PACHWA
Respondant Advocate VEMULA GOURISHANKARA RAO
First Appeal No. FA/1112/09(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/07/2009 in Case No. 233/2008 of District Krishna at Vijaywada)1. 1.M/S.IDEA CELLULAR LTD,(PREVIOUSLY TATA COMMUNICATIONS LTD)K.L.K.ESTATE, FATEH MAIDAN ROAD, HYDERABAD.2. 2.M/S. IDEAL CELLULAR LTD, BRANCH OFFICE39-7-1,KRISH...
Case Number: 1112
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. V/S VIJAY BERI
Tata Aig General Insurance General Insurance Tata
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. JYOTI DUTT SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4021 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 02/08/2011 in Appeal No. 130/2011 of the State Commission Delhi)1. VIJAY BERIS/o Late Smt Sushila Deve Beri, R/o No-24-UA/5916,Jawahar NagarDelhi - 110007.............
Case Number: 4021
|
Date of Filing: 12-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2012
M.K.Rao,Allied pack & Move Pvt. Ltd.,Khastra No.605,Near Tata global Motor,Opp.IGI Airport NH-8,Rang V/S Jagdish Prasad, Aged 70 years, Retd from BHEL
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate in person
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1861
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2022
TATA Motors Limited V/S Shaik Jangu Miayan
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr.Mohd.Muneeruddin
Respondant Advocate M/s.Hari & Associates
First Appeal No. FA/649/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/01/2010 in Case No. CC 735/2009 of District Hyderabad-III)1. Shaik Jangu Miayans/o.Jahangir Sab, age 34 years, Occ:driver, R/o.H.no.11-21-716, NTR Nagar, LB Nagar, R.R.District............Appellant(s)Versus1. TATA Motors L...
Case Number: 649
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Tata Motors Finance Ltd., V/S S.K. Raghavendra
Tata Motors Finance Finance Tata Motors Finance Tata
Court Name: Shimoga
Appelant Advocate Sri. Jayanth Kumar Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 280
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 23-09-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tata in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tata ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tata under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.