Court Name: Balaghat
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 75
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-03-2021
Tata Motors Tata Motors Finance Tata
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. SONDHI NARULA DALAL & ASSOCIATES, MR. SUNIL DALAL, MR. SANJEEV NARULA, MS. SANGEETA SONDHI, MOHIT SHARMA, MS. NITIKA AGARWAL & MR. ZASHAAN
Respondant Advocate MR.TARUN AHUJA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 894 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 26/09/2011 in Appeal No. 935/2009 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. TATA FINANCE LTD. (NOW TATA MOTORS LTD.)Through its Director/ MD/ Manager, 4th floor, Kanchan...
Case Number: 894
|
Date of Filing: 28-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2012
Tata Motors Tata Motors Finance Finance Tata Motors Finance Tata
Court Name: Kannur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,KANNURComplaint Case No. CC/221/20111. Ranjith Kumar CAnugraha , PO Kadachira ,KannurKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Tata Motors Finance Ltd, Ward no 789, Wib 15 1st Floor, South Bazar, 6700012Kannur Kerala 2. Tata Motors Ltd, Pass...
Case Number: 221
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Life Insurance Life Insurance Tata Tata Aig
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Nitin Thatai Adv. for the applicants/appellants
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/370/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District )1. TATA AIG Life Insurance Co. Ltd.SCO No. 107-108 2nd Floor Sector-43/B, Chandigarh through its Legal manager, Sh. Rahul Dhanotia...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Devi ParmilaW/o Vijay Narian Chau...
Case Number: 370
|
Date of Filing: 07-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Life Insurance Life Insurance Tata Tata Aig Tata Aig Life Insurance Company
Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional
Appelant Advocate Bannidini & Co Advocates
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/12/11531. Chandra Shekhar T.MNo774,53rd Cross 14th Main Kumaraswamy Layout 1st stage Near Ploice Station Bangalo...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 08-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/820/2011(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/03/2011 in Case No. CC/442/2009 of District Visakhapatnam-II)1. The CEO, TATA Tele Services Ltd., Hyderabad...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Mr.Golla Sudharshana Rao S/o Krishna Rao, Hindu, aged 42 yrs., Satyavaram Vg., Paya...
Case Number: 820
|
Date of Filing: 09-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate D. C. Adkar
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/12/5541. DENSO THERMAL SYSTEM PUNE PVT. LTD.,Gat No.1228/2,Sanaswadi, Tal. Shirur Dist. Pune-412 208. M.S.PuneMaha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. TATA Teleservices (Maharashtra) Limited,A1 Aqmar Bldg Behind Kala Niketan, Opp. Sancheti Hospital, Ganesh Khin...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 05-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 226
|
Date of Filing: 07-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 09-08-2017
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate V.Krishna Menon
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/11/629(Arisen out of Order Dated 22/06/2011 in Case No. CC/08/498 of District Ernakulam)1. M/s TATA Motors Ltd3 rd Floor,Tutus Tower,N.H.Byepass Road,Padivattom,KochiErnakulam Ker...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 15-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate CELINE JOSEPH
Respondant Advocate
Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/12/282(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/12/2011 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/09/14 of District Wayanad)1. PRAKASH JOSEPHTHARAYIL HOUSE,VADUVANCHAL POST,AMBALAVAYILWAYNADKERALA......
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 31-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tata in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tata ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tata under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.