Tata
Latest Judgments
Total 13134 Consumer Court Cases Against Tata.
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-10-2016
TATA TELKO PVT.LTD AND KARGO PVT.LTD AND MAYUR AUTO MOBILES V/S BAROT ARUNBHAI C
Court Name: Banas Kantha
Appelant Advocate B.K.AACHARYA
Respondant Advocate S.G.SHAH
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2019
TATA MOTORS FIN.LTD. V/S LAXMI N.UPADHYAY
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2010
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2016
The Manager, Tata Motors Ltd, 6/1167 Arafa complex, cherrooty road, Calicut. V/S Rajan Babu, Parambathu House, Kalpetta Post,
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/103/20121. Rajan Babu, Parambathu House, Kalpetta Post,Vythiri taluk............Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager, Tata Motors Ltd, 6/1167 Arafa complex, cherrooty road, Calicut.Cheruty road, 673032.2. The Manager, Tata Motors Ltd, DGP House, 4th floor, old...
Case Number: 103
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GITANJALI PRADHAN & ANR. V/S TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE CO. LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO.
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2182 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 19/02/2013 in Appeal No. 475/1999 of the State Commission Orissa) WITH IA/3622/20131. TATA ENGINEERING AND LOCOMOTIVE CO. LTD. & ANR.26TH FLOOR, WORLI TRADE CENTRE...
Case Number: 2182
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-03-2014
Manager Tata Motors Indore V/S Seetaram Yadav
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 67
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-04-2016
TATA MOTORS LTD. V/S YATENDRA P.SINGH
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 01-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2016
MANISH KUMAR & ANR V/S TATA MOTORS LIMITED
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. KARANJAWALA & CO
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2036 OF 2008(Against the Order dated null in Appeal No. of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. M/S. KAMAL & CO.aaa...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. MANISH KUMAR & ANR.aaa...........Respondent(s) REVISION ...
Case Number: 2492
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2008
|
Date of Upload: 24-03-2014
M/s. R.M. Dayama a Partnership Fim By it,s Partner Shri Govind Ratanlal Dayam, And Others, V/S Tata Finance Limtted.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate None
Respondant Advocate None
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/04/68(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/11/2003 in Case No. cc/1994/213 of District Amravati)1. Tata Finance Limtted.R...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 13-01-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
P. Ravinder Rao, S/o. Linga Rao, Age: 43 Years, Occ: Owener of TATA HITACHI EXCAVATOR, R/o. H.No. 6- V/S 1. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Office at 608 & 609, II Block, White House, Begumpet, Hyderabad-500 029.
Bajaj Allianz Bajaj Allianz Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Hitachi General Insurance Tata Tata Hitachi Bajaj
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. N. Mohan Krishna
Respondant Advocate M/s V. Gouri Sankara Rao
BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/497/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 30/04/2013 in Case No. CC/163/2012 of District Warangal)1. 1. Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co. Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager, Office at 608 & 609, ...
Case Number: 497
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Tata in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Tata ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Tata under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.