company-name-logo

Suzuki

Latest Judgments

Total 1295 Consumer Court Cases Against Suzuki.

West Bengal

The Manager, Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. V/S Soumya Basu

Maruti Suzuki   Maruti   Suzuki  

Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)

Appelant Advocate Partha Sarathi Kashyapi

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT - II (CENTRAL)8-B, NELLIE SENGUPTA SARANI, 7TH FLOOR,KOLKATA-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/476/2017( Date of Filing : 21 Nov 2017 )1. Soumya Basu288, Purba Sinthee Road, Fakir Ghosh Colony, Dum Dum , Kolkata-700030...............

Case Number: 476

|

Date of Filing: 21-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 26-10-2018

Haryana

Maruti Suzuki India Limited V/S Manoj Gupta

Maruti Suzuki   Maruti   Suzuki  

Court Name: Karnal

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Manoj Gupta Vs. Maruti SuzukiPresent: Complainant in person. Complainant moved an application for restoration of the above titled case. It is alleged in the application on 20.07.2018 the above titled case was dismissed in default. Heard on the application. It is pertinent to ...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2018

|

Date of Upload: 16-11-2018

Madhya Pradesh

M.D., Maruti Suzuki India Ltd. V/S Navodit Khandelwal S/O Shri Purushottam Khandelwal

Maruti Suzuki   Maruti   Suzuki  

Court Name: Shivpuri

Appelant Advocate Deepak Gupta

Respondant Advocate Ashish Shrivastav

Case Number: 208

|

Date of Filing: 01-06-2013

|

Date of Upload: 22-10-2018

Rajasthan

Maruti Suzuki V/S Govind prasad jain

Maruti Suzuki   Maruti   Suzuki  

Court Name: Sawai Madhopur

Appelant Advocate Anil jain

Respondant Advocate G.p.sharma

Case Number: 21

|

Date of Filing: 02-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2018

Madhya Pradesh

MANAGER M/S.MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. AND OTHERS V/S VIPLAV PANDEY S/O VEDPRAKASH PANDEY AGE 35 YRS

Suzuki  

Court Name: Satna

Appelant Advocate PRATEEK SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate RAMNIWAS SHARMA

Case Number: 333

|

Date of Filing: 15-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-11-2018

Madhya Pradesh

Maruti Suzuki Service Centers V/S Ashutosh Agrawal

Maruti Suzuki   Maruti   Suzuki  

Court Name: Chhatarpur

Appelant Advocate Shri Manish Chansoriya

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 29-08-2017

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2018

NCDRC

SHIVANAND S. HARAPANAHALLI & 2 ORS. V/S MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MARUTI UDYOG LTD.)

Maruti Suzuki   Maruti   Suzuki  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. K.P. SUNDAR RAO & ASSOCIATES

Respondant Advocate MR. YOGESH MALHOTRA

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2366 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/03/2012 in Appeal No. 21/2010 of the State Commission Goa) 1. M/S. CHOWGULE INDUSTRIES LTD.BD BandodKar Marg Opp Campal Panji Goa...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....

Case Number: 2367

|

Date of Filing: 26-06-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2018

Madhya Pradesh

M.D., Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.,New Dehli V/S Anand Goyal S/O Lt. Shri Rameswar Dayal Goyal

Maruti Suzuki   Maruti   Suzuki  

Court Name: Shivpuri

Appelant Advocate Deepak Sharma

Respondant Advocate Ashish Puranik

Case Number: 379

|

Date of Filing: 18-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2018

Rajasthan

Mr. Brijpal Singh Rathore s/o Baldev Singh V/S Maruti Suzuki India Limited

Maruti Suzuki   Maruti   Suzuki  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Sarita Shrma

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1FIRST APPEAL NO: 1211/2017Prem Motors Pvt.Ltd. authorized dealer Maruti Suzuki India Ltd., 12/13 Sudershanpura Industrial Area, Jaipur. Through Chief General Manager Vikas SharmaVs.Brijpal Singh Rathore ...

Case Number: 1233

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2017

|

Date of Upload: 05-10-2018

Andhra Pradesh

Maruti Suzuki India Limited V/S Venkatarama Jogayya Chegondi

Maruti Suzuki   Maruti   Suzuki  

Court Name: Visakhapatnam-II

Appelant Advocate A.S. Rama Sarma

Respondant Advocate S. Nagesh Kumar

Case Number: 172

|

Date of Filing: 27-04-2018

|

Date of Upload: 30-10-2018

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Suzuki in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Suzuki ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Suzuki under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.