Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. K.P. SUNDAR RAO & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2033 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/02/2012 in Appeal No. 2030/2010 of the State Commission Punjab)1. MARUTI SUZUKI INDIA LTD.Plot No-1,Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant KunjNew Delhi - 1100070Delhi........
Case Number: 2033
|
Date of Filing: 23-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 03-12-2012
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Rajbir Singh Guron
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 492 of 2011 1. Gurdeep SinghR/o # 173/A, PEC Campus, Sector 12, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Maruti Suzuki India Limited,through its Re...
Case Number: 492
|
Date of Filing: 25-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate Girish Kumar A.G
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/10/1381. Rajalekshmi T.TW/O Jagadeesh Chandran,Vishnupriya,Krishnan Koil Road,Near Keralkada,KaithamukkuTVMKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Regional Manager, Maruti Suz...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate M.s.Brar
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/3951. Baldev singh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maruti suzuki ltd............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONABLE MRS. Vikramjit Kaur Soni PRES...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Neeraj Sharma & Anupam Sharma
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 31 of 2011 1. Surinder Sharma# 726, Sector 22/A, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Managing Director, Maruti Suzuki India Ltd,Nalson Man...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 20-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sh. Parmod Kumar Jain, Adv. for the appellant
Respondant Advocate Sh. Vikas Jain, Adv. alongwith Sh. Neeraj Sobti, Adv. for resp 1, Sh. Aftab Singh, Adv. for resp. 2, Sh. Sandeep Jasuja, Adv. for resp. 3.
The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 240 of 2012 1. Maruti Suzuki India Ltd.Regd. Office at Plot no. 1, Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi-110070 ..............
Case Number: 240
|
Date of Filing: 23-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. V.P. SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4053 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 10/10/2012 in Appeal No. of the State Commission Delhi)1. R.K. SHARMAA/4 Oriental Enclave Plot No-32, Inderprastha ExtnDELHI - 1100092...........Petitioner(s)Versus...
Case Number: 4053
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-10-2012
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Ashok Gupta
Respondant Advocate
DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/12/2581. Mandip singhson Sh. Mohinder singh r/o 20087 A, street No.3 A, Jujhar Singh nagar,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maruti s...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. GKT LAW ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2125 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 23/02/2012 in Appeal No. 33/2008 of the State Commission Haryana)1. MARUTHI SUZUKI INDIA LTD. (FORMERLY KNOWN AS MARUTHI UDYOG LTD.)1 Nelson Mandela Road,Vasant Kun...
Case Number: 2125
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 16-10-2012
Court Name: Dhar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 33
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-11-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Suzuki in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Suzuki ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Suzuki under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.