Court Name: Adilabad
Appelant Advocate Mr. T. Devender Singh
Respondant Advocate None
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 17-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 20-08-2015
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Avikal Goyal
Respondant Advocate
Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/2081. Karam chand Sharmason of Om Parkash sharma r/o House No.263,Kamla Nehru colony Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 24-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 07-08-2015
Court Name: Sonipat
Appelant Advocate AMIT BALYAN
Respondant Advocate P.K. GUPTA
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SONEPAT. Complaint No.310 of 2014. Instituted on:17.11.2014. Date of order:07.08.2015Manoj son of Dharam Pal resident of H.No.244-A/19, Preet Vihar, old DC road, Sonepat. ...Complainant. Versus1.The Manager/Incharge, Sodhi ...
Case Number: 310
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2015
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/14/2851. Shaji PMMedical college Po,Tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maruthi suzuki India Ltdnelson mandela road,New Delhi2. Indus motors company ltdkeshavadhasapuram,Tvp...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 22-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-08-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Shri Uday Palnitkar, learned counsel for the petitioner.Shri Jay Prakash Chandravanshi, learned counsel for the respondent no.1. He has filed vakalatnama. It is taken on record.Shri S. K. Yadav, representative of respondent no.2.The petitioner/opposite party no.1 has filed this r...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 19-08-2015
Court Name: Jodhpur-II
Appelant Advocate GULAB SINGH
Respondant Advocate ANIL K SHARMA
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDERESSL FORUM JODHPUR 2RAJASTHANComplaint Case No. CC/225/20141. LAXMIMAL LODAJODHPUR...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MARUTI SUZUKIJODHPUR............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. TAFFAZUL HUSAIN SAMMA PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. SMT SUNITA KACHHAWAHA ME...
Case Number: 225
|
Date of Filing: 02-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2015
Maruti Suzuki Automobile Maruti Suzuki
Court Name: Karnal
Appelant Advocate R.K. Kamra
Respondant Advocate Subodh Gupta, A.K. Vohra
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL. Complaint No.251 of 2013 Date of instt. 24.05.2013 Date of decision: 01.09.2015Atul Gupta son of Sh.Suresh Kumar resident of House no.2243, Sector 13, Urban Estate, Karnal. ……….Complainant. Versu...
Case Number: 251
|
Date of Filing: 27-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-09-2015
Court Name: Jalandhar
Appelant Advocate Nipun Bajaj
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/349/20141. Vishal Shrma S/o Sh Chaman Lal SharmaHouse No.33,Durga Vihar Phase-II,Hoshiarpur Road,JalandharPunjab...........C...
Case Number: 349
|
Date of Filing: 13-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2015
Court Name: SAS Nagar Mohali
Appelant Advocate Vishal Gupta
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/14/4921. Pawan KumarS/o Late Sh. Hans Raj r/o Village Sukhrampur Tapprian, District-Roopnagar (Punjab)............Complainant(s)Versus1. Maruti Suzuki Ltd.Through its Managing Diector Head Office 1 Nelson Mandela Road, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi....
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 05-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 27-07-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT KUMAR GOYAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA First Appeal No : 177 of 2015Date of Institution: 24.02.2015Date of Decision : 17.07.2015Pardeep Kumar s/o Sh. Risal Singh, Resident of Village Garh Shejanpur, P.O. Shahpur Turk, Tehsil and District Sonepat. Appellan...
Case Number: 177
|
Date of Filing: 24-02-2015
|
Date of Upload: 24-07-2015
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Suzuki in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Suzuki ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Suzuki under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.