Suyojit Infrastructure
Latest Judgments
Total 75 Consumer Court Cases Against Suyojit Infrastructure.
TEIRTH DEVELOPERS AND SUYOJIT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S MR. YOGESH RAMLING WARAD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U P Warunjikar
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2017
TEIRTH DEVELOPERS AND SUYOJIT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S VAIBHAV EKNATH FARKANDE
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR, MR. AMOL V. DESHMUKH & MS. KANCHAN VOHRA
Respondant Advocate MR. SAURABH VERMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 935 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/04/2016 in Complaint No. 502/2013 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. YOGESH RAMLING WARADR/AT 8, PREMDHAM APARTMENTS, GOKHALE ROAD, NEAR E- SQUARE PUNE-411016.........
Case Number: 936
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2017
TEIRTH DEVELOPERS AND SUYOJIT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & 2 ORS. V/S YOGESH RAMLING WARAD
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR, MR. AMOL V. DESHMUKH & MS. KANCHAN VOHRA
Respondant Advocate MR. SAURABH VERMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 935 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/04/2016 in Complaint No. 502/2013 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. YOGESH RAMLING WARADR/AT 8, PREMDHAM APARTMENTS, GOKHALE ROAD, NEAR E- SQUARE PUNE-411016.........
Case Number: 935
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2017
VAIBHAV EKNATH FARKANDE V/S TEIRTH DEVELOPERS AND SUYOJIT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & 2 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SAURABH VERMA & MR. HEMANT SHAH
Respondant Advocate MR. DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR & MR. AMOL VISHWASHRAO DESHMUKH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 935 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/04/2016 in Complaint No. 502/2013 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. YOGESH RAMLING WARADR/AT 8, PREMDHAM APARTMENTS, GOKHALE ROAD, NEAR E- SQUARE PUNE-411016.........
Case Number: 1132
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2017
YOGESH RAMLING WARAD V/S M/S. TEIRTH DEVELOPERS AND SUYOJIT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. & 2 ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SAURABH VERMA & MR. HEMANT SHAH
Respondant Advocate MR. DILIP ANNASAHEB TAUR & MR. AMOL VISHWASRAO DESHMUKH
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 935 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 25/04/2016 in Complaint No. 502/2013 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. YOGESH RAMLING WARADR/AT 8, PREMDHAM APARTMENTS, GOKHALE ROAD, NEAR E- SQUARE PUNE-411016.........
Case Number: 1131
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2017
M/S. TEIRTH DEVELOPERS AND SUYOJIT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD V/S MR. MAHESH MUTYALWAR
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SANTOSH T. KANCHAR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 28-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 07-11-2016
TEIRTH DEVELOPERS AND SUYOJIT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S MR. VAIBHAV EKNATH FARKANDE
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GORAKH LAMBKHADE
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-12-2016
TEIRTH DEVELOPERS AND SUYOJIT INFRASTRUCTURE LTD. V/S MR. YOGESH RAMLING WARAD
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate GORAKH LAMBKHADE
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-10-2016
Suyojit Infrastructure Ltd V/S Indra Rupchandji Ostawal
Court Name: Nashik
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 164
|
Date of Filing: 03-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2015
Teirth Developers and Suyojit Infrastructure Limited, V/S Dr. Bharat Madanlal Picha,
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate -
Complaint Case No. CC/12/6101. Dr. Bharat Madanlal Picha,R/at Bldg. No. 18-A/604, Sudarshan CHS Ltd., Pantnagar, Ghatkoper (E), Mumbai-75.2. Preeti Bharat Picha,R/at S.No.51/2A/2, Datta Digambar Apartment, Nr. Post Office, Wadgaon Bk. Pune-411 041............Complainant(s)Versus1...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Suyojit Infrastructure in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Suyojit Infrastructure ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Suyojit Infrastructure under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.