Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AYDE ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 618 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/11/2012 in Appeal No. 25/2011 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/1082/20131. M/S. SUPERTECH LTD............Petitioner(s)Versus1. GURVINDER SINGH & ANR..........
Case Number: 618
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2014
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/13/1291. C JAGADEESANANUGRAHA NAGAR POOZHIKUNNU PAPPANAMKODE...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE MANAGER ,/S SUPERTECH SOLUTIONSGANGADARSAN JAGATHY TVPM............Opp.Party(...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 27-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. P. R. RAJHANS
Respondant Advocate MR. TANAY AYDE
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 54 OF 20111. RAJUL MAHESHWARIA-120, Sector-40, NoidaGautam Budh NagarU.P...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S. SUPERTECH LTD.Through Its Chairman & managing Director Shri R.K. Arora, 1114, Hemkunt Chambers...
Case Number: 54
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 02-07-2013
Court Name: Pune
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/1581. Mr. Satish P. UpsaniB/504, spring fields CHS, off gananjay society road, Kothrud, PunePuneMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SMART CARE Through it's Authorised service provider supertech sales and servicesShop No.= 11, 'C' Wing, Agarwal pr...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 03-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. TANYA AYDE & MS. SUJATA RAO AYDE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1896 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/12/2011 in Appeal No. 2341/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. M/S. SUPERTECH LTD.Off-114 Hemkunt Chambers 89,Nehru Place,New Delhi -19Delhi..............
Case Number: 1896
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2012
|
Date of Upload: 08-01-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. JYOTI DUTT SHARMA & MR. RAHUL SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 429 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 02/05/2012 in Complaint No. 212/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. UDAY BHAN SINGH TEOTIAS/o. Late Shri Devi Singh, R/o. A-107, Sector-31, Distrcit Gautam Budh NagarNo...
Case Number: 429
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. TANYA AYDE & MS. SUJATA RAO AYDE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 696 OF 2012 IN RP/1896/20121. M/S. SUPERTECH LTD............Appellants(s)Versus1. NITIN RASTOGI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER For the Ap...
Case Number: 696
|
Date of Filing: 27-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-10-2012
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Vikas Srivastava Bakshi
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Miscellaneous Application No. M/2012/195In1. Supertech Ltd a BEFORE:HON'ABLE MR. JUSTICE Virendra Singh PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MR. Sanjay Kumar MEMBER For the Appellant:F...
Case Number: 2012
|
Date of Filing: 18-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. GAGAN GUPTA & MR. SAURABH GUPTA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 234 OF 20121. RITU BANSALW/o Sh Rajesh Bansal R/o 'Bansal Bhawan', 8c/1, Batery Lane, Rajpur Road, Civil Lines,Delhi-1100542. Sh Ram Kishor AroraChairman & Managing Director,Supertech House, B-28-29, Secto...
Case Number: 234
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-09-2012
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MT. TANAY AYDE & MS. SUJATA RAO AYDE
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1141 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/12/2011 in Appeal No. 2341/2011 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. M/S. SUPERTECH LTD.Regd.Office: -114 Hemkunt Chembers, 89 nehru PlaceNew Delhi -19Delhi....
Case Number: 1141
|
Date of Filing: 19-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2012
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Supertech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Supertech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Supertech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.