Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 02.03.2015Complaint Case No.-256/2013IN THE MATTER OF:-1. Vivek Ramachandran2. Shobha Ramachandran Both residents of: 16, Arunachalam Road, Kotnrpuram, Chennai -6000...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 01-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision : 25.02.2015Complaint Case No.324/2011Sh. Saroj Kumar PatnaikS/o Late Sh. R.N.PatnaikA/11, 5th FloorLord Gunjan ApartmentsBomikhal, RasulgarhOdisha Complainant No. 1S...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION : DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision : 25.02.2015Complaint Case No.325/2011Smt. Manoj MohantyW/o Sh. Kalyan MohantyA/12, 5th FloorLord Gunjan ApartmentsBomikhal, RasulgarhOdisha Complainant No. 1Sh. Kaly...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-10-2011
|
Date of Upload: 13-03-2015
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/873/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/03/2014 in Case No. CC/183/2011 of District New Delhi)1. M/S SUPERTECH LTD. & ANR.1114, HEMKUNT CHAMBERS, 89, NEHRU PLACE, N.D.-11...
Case Number: 873
|
Date of Filing: 02-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.S. AGARWAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3619 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 29/04/2014 in Appeal No. 642/2013 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. SUPERTECH LTD............Petitioner(s)Versus1. ASHISH KUMAR SINGH...........
Case Number: 3619
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K. MARUTHI RAO & MRS. K. RADHA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1391 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 17/01/2014 in Appeal No. 7/2014 of the State Commission Uttaranchal)1. M/S. SUPERTECH LTD.REGD OFFICE, 1114, HEMKUND CHAMBERS, 89 NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHIA.P2. SHAILD...
Case Number: 1391
|
Date of Filing: 12-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.S. AGARWAL & ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3618 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 08/08/2014 in Appeal No. 212/2010 of the State Commission Delhi)1. MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S. SUPERTECH LTD.114/HEMKUNT CHAMBERS,, 89 NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI - ...........
Case Number: 3618
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-10-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. TANAY AYDE
Respondant Advocate IN PERSON
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2729 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 04/07/2013 in Appeal No. 1749/2012 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. M/S. SUPERTECH LTD.CORP OFFICE B-28-29 SECTOR-58NOIDAU.P...........Petitioner(s)Versus1....
Case Number: 2729
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K. MARUTHI RAO, MRS. K. RADHA RAO & MR. RAJNISH KUMAR SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2528 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 19/03/2014 in Appeal No. 55/2014 of the State Commission Uttaranchal)1. M/S. SUPERTECH INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD. & 2 ORS.PENTAGON MALL, PLOT NO-C-1 SECTOR-12, SIDCUL...
Case Number: 2528
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-07-2014
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. AYDE ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 617 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 16/11/2012 in Appeal No. 24/2011 of the State Commission Delhi) WITH IA/1081/20131. M/S. SUPERTECH LTD............Petitioner(s)Versus1. GURVINDER SINGH & ANR..........
Case Number: 617
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-03-2014
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Supertech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Supertech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Supertech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.