Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAHUL RATHORE
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :26.11.2020Date of Decision :04.12.2020COMPLAINT NO.737/2016In the matter of: Mr. Jai Prakash Yadav Son of Shri R.D. Yadav, R/o. B-551, Gali No.33, Mahavir Enclave, Pa...
Case Number: 737
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAHUL RATHORE
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :26.11.2020Date of Decision :04.12.2020COMPLAINT NO.738/2016In the matter of: Mr. Anil Gautam, Son of Shri Shyam Sunder, R/o. RZ 1/5151, Gali No.3, Tugalka Bad Extensi...
Case Number: 738
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAHUL RATHORE
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :26.11.2020Date of Decision :04.12.2020COMPLAINT NO.741/2016In the matter of: Mr. Lalit Mishra, S/o. Shri R.D. Mishra, R/o. E-448, Street No.8,West Vinod Nagar,Delhi-1...
Case Number: 741
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2021
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate RAHUL RATHORE
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATECOMMISSION :DELHI(Constituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Arguments :26.11.2020Date of Decision :04.12.2020COMPLAINT NO.746/2016In the matter of: Mr. Vivek Kumar Barnwal,S/o. Shri Jai Prakash Barnwal, R/o. H.No.29/1 Puradan Kabir,Mauna...
Case Number: 746
|
Date of Filing: 12-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 05-01-2021
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. EXIMIUS LAW PARTNERS LLP
Respondant Advocate MR. P. VINAY KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1571 OF 2019(Against the Order dated 18/06/2019 in Complaint No. 534/2017 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. M/S. SUPERTECH LIMITEDREGD. OFFICE AT:- 1114, 11TH FLOOR, HEMKUNT CHAMBER, 89, NEHRU PLACE....
Case Number: 1571
|
Date of Filing: 29-07-2019
|
Date of Upload: 01-12-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. SHRUTI IYER & MR. ANANDH K.
Respondant Advocate MS. PREETIKA DWIVEDI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 147 OF 2018 IN CC/36/20171. DIVYESH PRATAP SINGH & 2 ORS............Appellants(s)Versus1. SUPERTECH LTD. & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. PREM NARAIN,PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE ...
Case Number: 147
|
Date of Filing: 08-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 16-11-2020
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None
Case Number: 201
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2020
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate AMIT KUMAR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Miscellaneous Application No. MA/146/2020( Date of Filing : 29 Sep 2020 )In1. DR. PRAVEEN GARGFLAT NO 701, CREMA TOWER, 7th FLOOR, MAHAGUN MAFARS, SECTOR 50, NOIDA, ...........Appellant(s)V...
Case Number: 146
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2020
|
Date of Upload: 09-10-2020
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANSHUMAN TIWARI, MR. S.N. TRIPATHY, MR. JAYANT CHAURASIA & MR. SUNIL KUMAR TIWARI
Respondant Advocate MS. BHAVNA DHAMI ,BHRIGU DHAMI & M/S. SETHI LAW OFFICE LLP
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 2265 OF 20171. LALATENDU NAYAK & ANR.S/O SHRI LINGARAJ NAYAK R/O 1041, ENGINEERS APPTS., PLOT NO. 11, SECTOR-18A, DWARKA,NEW DELHI-1100782. MRS. SMARANIKA NAYAKW/O SHRI LALATENDU NAYAK R/O 1041, ENGINEERS ...
Case Number: 2265
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2017
|
Date of Upload: 30-09-2020
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Sarvesh Kumar Sharma
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. RP/28/2020( Date of Filing : 08 Sep 2020 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 31/05/2019 in Case No. C/254/2019 of District Kanpur Nagar)1. Supertech To...
Case Number: 28
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2020
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2020
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Supertech in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Supertech ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Supertech under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.