company-name-logo

Storage

Latest Judgments

Total 1630 Consumer Court Cases Against Storage.

Rajasthan

Gurunanak Cold Storage & Jn. Mills V/S 59/2016 Raj Kumar

Storage   Cold Storage  

Court Name: Ganganagar

Appelant Advocate Jitender Sarpal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 15-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 20-06-2016

Punjab

Jatindra Cold Storage V/S Gurmail Singh

Storage   Cold Storage  

Court Name: Hoshiarpur

Appelant Advocate Sh. DK Saandal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2016

Punjab

Jatindra Cold Storage V/S Ajit Pal

Storage   Cold Storage  

Court Name: Hoshiarpur

Appelant Advocate Sh. DK Saandal

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-2016

|

Date of Upload: 29-11-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Radheyshyam Cold Storage & Ice Factory V/S Kishundev Yadav

Storage   Cold Storage  

Court Name: Ghazipur

Appelant Advocate Shri Syed Mazharul Hasan

Respondant Advocate Shri Murli Manohar Sinha

Case Number: 210

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2004

|

Date of Upload: 03-06-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Radheyshyam Cold Storage & Ice Factory V/S Kishundev Yadav

Storage   Cold Storage  

Court Name: Ghazipur

Appelant Advocate Shri Syed Majharul Hasan

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1

|

Date of Filing: 23-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 02-06-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Kaushlendra Singh V/S M/s Sri Shankar Cold Storage

Storage   Cold Storage  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Anupam Kumar

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2006/1912(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. M/s Sri Shankar Cold Storage a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Kaushlendra Singhas....

Case Number: 2006

|

Date of Filing: 14-08-2006

|

Date of Upload: 16-08-2016

Uttar Pradesh

Mahendra Pratap Singh V/S Baba Cold Storage

Storage   Cold Storage  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Vijay Kumar

Respondant Advocate Ajay Pratap Singh

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2005/1623(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Baba Cold Storage A...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Mahendra Pratap Singhs............

Case Number: 2005

|

Date of Filing: 03-10-2005

|

Date of Upload: 03-06-2016

NCDRC

GURMINDER SINGH V/S KRISHAN COL STORAGE

Storage  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate M/S. MITTAL & MITTAL CO.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 817 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 01/09/2015 in Appeal No. 641/2014 of the State Commission Punjab)1. KRISHAN COL STORAGETHROUGH ITS PARTNER/MANAGER, SARABJIT SINGH, S/O S.GURKIRPAL SINGH, R/O BASTI ...

Case Number: 817

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2016

|

Date of Upload: 26-05-2016

Punjab

M/s Malhotra Storage Batteries V/S Amit Beri S/o Late Shri Krishan Kishore Beri

Storage  

Court Name: Jalandhar

Appelant Advocate Sh Kanwar Opinder Singh Jaswal

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum Ladowali Road, District Administrative Complex,2nd Floor, Room No - 217 JALANDHAR (PUNJAB) Complaint Case No. CC/264/20151. Amit Beri S/o Late Shri Krishan Kishore BeriR/o 396-A,Surya EnclaveJalandharPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus...

Case Number: 264

|

Date of Filing: 15-06-2015

|

Date of Upload: 06-05-2016

West Bengal

Madan Mohan Cold Storage Pvt. Ltd., V/S Sri Gobinda Nath Roy,

Storage   Cold Storage  

Court Name: Cooch Behar

Appelant Advocate Mr. Rabindra Dey

Respondant Advocate

District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumB. S. Road, Cooch BeharPh. No.230696, 222023Complaint Case No. CC/2/20161. Sri Gobinda Nath Roy,S/o. Late Rajendra Nath Roy, Vill. & P.O. Gopalpur, P.S. Kotwali, Dist. Cooch Behar-736133............Complainant(s)Versus1. Madan Mohan Cold ...

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 04-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 26-04-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Storage in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Storage ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Storage under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.