State Bank Of India
Latest Judgments
Total 13533 Consumer Court Cases Against State Bank Of India.
Manager, State Bank Of India V/S Vinod Kumar S/o Hanuman Prasad Jain
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Dhar
Appelant Advocate Hitesh Thakur
Respondant Advocate Shashi Shrivastav
Case Number: 118
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2009
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2016
MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA V/S ABRAHAM CHACKO
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. C. K. SASI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1647 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 07/07/2010 in Appeal No. 326/2010 of the State Commission Kerala)1. ABRAHAM CHACKOVALUMEL CHACKO, KATTAPPANA SOUTH P.O, IDUKIKERALA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. ...
Case Number: 1647
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2011
State Bank of India V/S Tripta Sharma
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 64 of 2011 1. Tripta SharmaChd. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. State Bank of Indiachd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For ...
Case Number: 64
|
Date of Filing: 24-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
RANVIR PRASAD SINGH V/S STATE BANK OF INDIA
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RAMESH N. KESWANI
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1354 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 01/09/2010 in Appeal No. 886/2006 of the State Commission Bihar)1. STATE BANK OF INDIAThrough Branch Manager, SBI Brahmpur Chaunasta, At Brahmpur, PO BrahmpurBuxarB...
Case Number: 1354
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2011
SURESH CHAND & ORS. V/S STATE BANK OF INDIA
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. SANJIV KAKRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2189 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 18/01/2010 in Appeal No. 1994/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. STATE BANK OF INDIAHaving its Corporate Centre at State Bhawan, Madame CAMA, Nariman PointMu...
Case Number: 2189
|
Date of Filing: 07-06-2010
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2011
STATE BANK OF INDIA V/S JITENDRA S MUNDRA
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Jamnagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 03-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 16-09-2020
Branch Manager State Bank Of India & Others V/S Smt Anita Khare & Others
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Satna
Appelant Advocate R.N. Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 26-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 24-02-2016
STATE BANK OF INDIA V/S AKHILESH TRIVEDI.
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 19-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 27-03-2017
State bank of India V/S Dr. M.L.Bansal
State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 13 of 2011 1. Dr. M.L.BansalChd. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 20 May 2011 ORDER DISTRICT F...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
State Bank Of India V/S Nitinbhai K. Nayak
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Bhavnagar
Appelant Advocate Atul Vaghela
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against State Bank Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against State Bank Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against State Bank Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.