State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate Adv. Mahesh Mourya
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/11/331. Shri Sudhir Niranjan Nayak302, Chandan NagarNagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Banch Manager State Bank of ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Gandhinagar
Appelant Advocate B.M.RATHORE
Respondant Advocate SELF
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-08-2020
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A MARATHE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIMiscellaneous Application No. MA/11/941. PRIYADARSHINI POLYSACKS LTDF-41 1 ST FLOOR TRADE CENTER STATION ROAD KOLHAPURKOLHAPURMAHARASHTRA ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. BRANCH OFFICER, STATE BANK...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A MARATHE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/160(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/10/2010 in Case No. 417/09 of District Kolhapur)1. PRIYADARSHINI POLYSACKS LTDF-41 1 ST FLOOR TRADE CENTER STATION ROAD KOLHAPURKOLHAPURMAHAR...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Damoh
Appelant Advocate Sh Arvind Singh Thakur
Respondant Advocate Sh Rajeev Nema
Case Number: 209
|
Date of Filing: 08-12-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-03-2016
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. JITENDRA KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1235 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 18/02/2011 in Appeal No. 144/2010 of the State Commission West Bengal)1. STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR.REGIONAL MANGER, REGIONAL BUSIONESS OFFICE AT BERAMPORE, P.O & P....
Case Number: 1235
|
Date of Filing: 15-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2011
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Kurnool
Appelant Advocate P.Siva Sudarshan
Respondant Advocate V.V.Krishnam Raju
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/40/20111. A.Ramana Goud, S/o Venkata SwamyRetired Railway Office Superintendent, Plot No.333, Geethamukerjee Nagar, Behind Santosh Nagar, Kurnool-518 003Kurnool Andhra Pradesh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Chief Manager, State Bank of ...
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S VAMARAJU SRI KRISHNUDU
Respondant Advocate
First Appeal No. FA/476/2010(Arisen out of Order Dated 12/03/2010 in Case No. CC/48/2008 of District Krishna at Machiliptnam)1. THE CHIEF MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIAMAIN BRANCH, MACHAVARAM, MACHILIPATNAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT.2. THE ASST.GENERAL MANAGERREGIONAL OFFICE, SBI REGION-4,...
Case Number: 476
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MAKARAND D. ADKAR & VIJAY KUMAR
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 215 OF 20111. ADISHWAR OILS & FATS LTD............Complainant(s)Versus1. STATE BANK OF INDIA...........Opp.Party(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. C. JAIN, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'BLE MR. S. K. NAIK, MEMBE...
Case Number: 215
|
Date of Filing: 13-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 05-12-2011
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 24-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 22-08-2017
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against State Bank Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against State Bank Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against State Bank Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.