State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 04-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2016
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Rajkot Addl
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 2013
|
Date of Filing: 30-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 29-07-2020
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.P. KAPUR & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR R.K. KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2013 IN RP/1814/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MEENA WALIA...........Respondent(s) REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2013 IN RP/1815/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA.............
Case Number: 42
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.P. KAPUR & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR R.K. KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2013 IN RP/1814/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MEENA WALIA...........Respondent(s) REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2013 IN RP/1815/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA.............
Case Number: 41
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.P. KAPUR & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR R.K. KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2013 IN RP/1814/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MEENA WALIA...........Respondent(s) REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2013 IN RP/1815/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA.............
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.P. KAPUR & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR R.K. KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2013 IN RP/1814/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MEENA WALIA...........Respondent(s) REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2013 IN RP/1815/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA.............
Case Number: 39
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. R.P. KAPUR & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR R.K KAPOOR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 38 OF 2013 IN RP/1814/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. MEENA WALIA...........Respondent(s) REVIEW APPLICATION NO. 39 OF 2013 IN RP/1815/20121. STATE BANK OF INDIA.............
Case Number: 38
|
Date of Filing: 04-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-08-2013
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 409 OF 2013 IN RP/3386/20111. JANAK LAL DWARI...........Appellants(s)Versus1. BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA & ANR............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRE...
Case Number: 409
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-09-2013
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate konapure
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/10/5451. valiahmad pachubhi shak ( daid) ligal heair jaherabi valiahmad shak355 begam peth solapursolapurmaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. branch manager united india iasurance co ltd (2) branch ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 08-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Sangli
Appelant Advocate MAHAVIR VASANT GAIKWAD
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/71. SHRI JAYSINGH R. SALUNKHEAT SPHURTI HOUSING SOCIETY, SANGAM NAGAR,SANGLIMAHARASHTRA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. STATE BANK OF INDIA THROUGH MANAGER SHRI S.G. FAWADE1ST LANE, BIJBHAVAN BLDG., TAL. MIRAJ, SANGLIMAHARASHTRA............Opp.Party(s) B...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 15-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against State Bank Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against State Bank Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against State Bank Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.