State Bank Of India
Latest Judgments
Total 13536 Consumer Court Cases Against State Bank Of India.
STATE BANK OF INDIA V/S BABLU KHAN
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Gwalior
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 01-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 09-03-2016
STATE BANK OF INDIA V/S S B BRAHMBHATT
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate H M SHROFF
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2019
State bank of India V/S Ashish v modha
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Ahmedabad Addl
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate S H ALMAULA
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 12-12-2019
State Bank of India V/S Kundan Kumar Gupta
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Uttar Dinajpur
Appelant Advocate Kunal Sengupta
Respondant Advocate
Before the HonorableUttar Dinajpur Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSuper Market Complex, Block 1 , 1st Floor.Execution Application No. EA/13/2InComplaint Case No. CC/12/411. Kundan Kumar Gupta Son of Sambhu Prasad Gupta, Anup Nagar, Dhulian, SamsherganjMursidabadWest Bengal........
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 27-02-2015
ANSHU V/S STATE BANK OF INDIA
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2012
|
Date of Upload: 25-10-2016
branch manager state bank of india kanker c.g. V/S prabhu dayal kol
State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Kanker
Appelant Advocate Shri Ajay Singh
Respondant Advocate Shri Ashok Khusik
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/13/11. prabhu dayal kolc/o sdo pwd bridge kanker c.g.kankerchhattisgarh...........Complainant(s)Versus1. branch manager state bank of india kanker c.g.kankerkankerchhattisgarh............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. o.p.gupta PRESIDENTHON'...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 14-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
STATE BANK OF INDIA V/S MD. SUBHAN
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate SURAJIT AUDDY
Respondant Advocate Swapnalekha Auddy
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/320/2012 1. MD. SUBHANG-58,MIRZA HOUSE,BATTIKAL ,P.O-MATIABRUZ,GARDEN REACH,P.S-MATIABRUZ, KOLKATA-700024. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. STATE BANK OF INDIA1,STRAND ROAD,P.S-HARE STREET, KOLKATA-...
Case Number: 320
|
Date of Filing: 01-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SMT.SAROJ GOYAL V/S STATE BANK OF INDIA
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-10-2016
State Bank of India V/S Dr. Balaram Chakravarti
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/14/211( Date of Filing : 20 Mar 2014 )1. Dr. Balaram Chakravarti24/2/19, Mondal Para Lane, Kolkata-700050............Com...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2023
SHANTILAL MAGANLAL PATEL V/S BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA
State Bank Of India State Bank Of India Bank Of India Bank Of India
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. S.L. GUPTA & PARTNERS
Respondant Advocate MR. JIGAR J. PATEL
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 66 OF 2014 IN RP/1615/20111. BRANCH MANAGER, STATE BANK OF INDIA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SHANTILAL MAGANLAL PATEL...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PR...
Case Number: 66
|
Date of Filing: 28-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2014
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against State Bank Of India in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against State Bank Of India ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against State Bank Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.