company-name-logo

State Bank Of India

Latest Judgments

Total 13556 Consumer Court Cases Against State Bank Of India.

Jharkhand

MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA SERAIKELLA BRANCH V/S SATYA NARAYAN AGARWAL

State Bank Of India   Bank Of India  

Court Name: Sareikela

Appelant Advocate Sanjay Kr Choudhary

Respondant Advocate Brajesh Kumar Verma

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/221/2012( Date of Filing : 27 Aug 2012 )1. SATYA NARAYAN AGARWAL Son of Ramje lal Agarwal R/o- ward no- 6 seraikella P.o&P.s- Seraikella Dist- Seraikella-kharsawanseraikella-kharsawanJharkhand ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGER STATE B...

Case Number: 221

|

Date of Filing: 27-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-08-2019

Jharkhand

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 22-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2022

West Bengal

The Bank Manager, State Bank of India V/S RAMJI PANDEY

State Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Bank Of India  

Court Name: Howrah

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah 711 101.Office (033) 2638 0892, Confonet (033) 2638 0512 Fax (033) 2638 0892Complaint Case No. CC/14/2981. RAMJI PANDEYS/O lt. Durga Pandey, Sukanto place 3rd, bye lane, Dakshin Bxarah, P.O. Dakshin Para...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 22-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

M/S. AMAR CLOTH HOUSE & 2 ORS. V/S STATE BANK OF INDIA

State Bank Of India   State Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Bank Of India  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. KUSH SAXENA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 1195 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 18/09/2014 in Complaint No. 887/2014 of the State Commission Uttar Pradesh)1. STATE BANK OF INDIATHOURGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER HAVING ITS CORPORATE OFFICE AT MADAM CAMA ROA...

Case Number: 1195

|

Date of Filing: 14-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 04-12-2014

Madhya Pradesh

STATE BANK OF INDIA V/S KHILAN PRASAD

State Bank Of India   State Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Bank Of India  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 357

|

Date of Filing: 18-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2017

Madhya Pradesh

Case Number: 466

|

Date of Filing: 03-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 14-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

STATE BANK OF INDIA V/S SANJAY MODI

State Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Bank Of India  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1199

|

Date of Filing: 12-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 20-01-2017

Jharkhand

Branch Manager , State Bank Of India V/S Dinesh Kumar Singh

State Bank Of India   State Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Bank Of India  

Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate Mr. Rizwan A Haffiz & B.B. Choudhary

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/121/2012( Date of Filing : 14 Nov 2012 )1. Dinesh Kumar SinghH.No-01, Gandhi Market , JadugoraPurbi SinghbhumJharkhand...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Branch Manager , State Bank Of India State Bank Of India , Jadugora Branch , Jamshedpur P...

Case Number: 121

|

Date of Filing: 14-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 11-10-2019

Jharkhand

Branch Manager State Bank of India Branch Bhawnathpur & Others V/S Ramraj Prajapati

State Bank Of India   State Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Bank Of India  

Court Name: Garhwa

Appelant Advocate Binod Kumar Pal

Respondant Advocate M.M Pandey

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 22-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 11-02-2022

Telangana

State Bank of India V/S G.Narendra Varma

State Bank Of India   Bank Of India   Bank Of India  

Court Name: Hyderabad-III

Appelant Advocate Mr..A.Satyawati

Respondant Advocate Mr.B.S.Prasad

Case Number: 580

|

Date of Filing: 15-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 10-02-2021

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against State Bank Of India in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against State Bank Of India ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against State Bank Of India under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.