Spicejet
Latest Judgments
Total 262 Consumer Court Cases Against Spicejet.
Dinesh Kumar V/S Spicejet Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Punj
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 498
|
Date of Filing: 11-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 15-02-2016
SPICEJET LTD. V/S Rajeev Tondon
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate M.S. Saini Adv. & Vandana Adv.
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IIU.T. ChandigarhFINAL ORDERExecution Application No. EA/150/2015InComplaint Case No. CC/29/20151. Rajeev TondonSon of Late Sh. Raj Kumar Tandon, Resident of 1541, Sector 7-C, Chandigarh............Appellant(s)Versus1. SPICEJET LTD.319, ...
Case Number: 150
|
Date of Filing: 01-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
SPICEJET LTD. V/S MONAL MODI
Court Name: Jaipur-III
Appelant Advocate RAKESH MITRUKA
Respondant Advocate -
Case Number: 1342
|
Date of Filing: 08-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-01-2016
The Manager Spicejet Ltd. V/S Shri R.Suriya Murthy
Court Name: Andaman
Appelant Advocate Mr. V.D. Siva Balan
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 12-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 05-07-2016
Justice N.K.Agarwal (Retd.) V/S Spicejet Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Punj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.:346 of 2015Date of Institution:23.12.2015Date of Decision:29.12.2015Spicejet Ltd.,319, Udyog Vihar, Phase-IV, Gurgaon – 122016.……Appellant/Opposite Party No.1V e r s u sJustice N.K. ...
Case Number: 346
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2016
Ranju Aery V/S Spicejet Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Punj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHFirst Appeal No.:347 of 2015Date of Institution:23.12.2015Date of Decision:29.12.2015Spicejet Ltd., 319, Udyog Vihar, Phase-IV, Gurgaon-122016.……Appellant/Opposite PartyV e r s u sRanju Aery w/o Sh.Abnesh ...
Case Number: 347
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-01-2016
Spicejet Ltd. V/S Shri Mahesh Sharma
Court Name: Kamrup
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMKAMRUP,GUWAHATIComplaint Case No. CC/87/2013( Date of Filing : 23 Aug 2013 )1. Shri Mahesh SharmaS/o- Late Ram Dayal Sharma, House No-25, Near Income Tax Colony, Bangaon, Beltola,Guwahati-28 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Spicejet Ltd....
Case Number: 87
|
Date of Filing: 23-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2022
The Regional Manager, Spicejet Limited V/S Thomas Findo
Court Name: South Chennai
Appelant Advocate M/s Nirmal Roy Sanjeevi
Respondant Advocate
Date of Complaint : 10.08.2012 Date of Order :11.12.2015DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (SOUTH)2nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C. Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3PRESENT : THIRU. B. RAMALINGAM, M.A.M.L., : PRESIDENT TMT.K. AMALA, M.A. L.L.B., : MEMBER – I...
Case Number: 294
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 01-06-2016
Rajeev Tandon V/S Spicejet Ltd,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No. : 322 of 2015Date of Institution : 30.11.2015Date of Decision : 02.12.2015SpiceJet Ltd., 319, Udyog Vihar, Phase-IV, Gurgaon 122016.……Appellant/Opposite Party No.1.VersusSh. Rajeev Tandon S/o...
Case Number: 322
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-12-2015
Dr. Sukhchain Singh Bhullar V/S Spicejet Ltd,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Punj
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No. : 323 of 2015Date of Institution : 30.11.2015Date of Decision : 02.12.2015SpiceJet Ltd., 319, Udyog Vihar, Phase-IV, Gurgaon 122016.……Appellant/Opposite Party No.1.VersusDr. Sukhchain Singh B...
Case Number: 323
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-12-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Spicejet in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Spicejet ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Spicejet under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.