Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. Hom Dev Vivek Kumar
Respondant Advocate Mr. Aloke Mukhopadhyay
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONWEST BENGAL11A, Mirza Ghalib Street, Kolkata - 700087First Appeal No. FA/415/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/03/2013 in Case No. CC/386/2012 of District North 24 Parganas)1. The Regional Manager, M/s. Spicejet Ltd.NSCBI Airport, Kolka...
Case Number: 415
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-08-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Punj
Respondant Advocate
2nd Additional BenchSTATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PUNJAB,DAKSHIN MARG, SECTOR 37-A, CHANDIGARH.Misc. Application Nos.3399 & 3400 of 2015 In/and First Appeal No.1275 of 2015 Date of institution: 23.12.2015Date of Decision: 02.08.2016 SPI...
Case Number: 1275
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-08-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated : 30/06/2016ORDER Copy of the stay order dated 22.06.2016 of the Hon’ble National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, New Delhi has been filed on behalf of OP. Sh. Gaurav Bhardwaj, counsel for the complainant has appended a note the first page of the execution app...
Case Number: 83
|
Date of Filing: 05-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
Court Name: Gurgaon
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,GURGAON-122001 Consumer Complaint No: 113 of 2014 Date of Institution: 16.04.2014 Date of Decision: 08.06.2016Ashutosh Sharma s/o Shri Brig.(Retd.) R.M.Sharma, Resident of H...
Case Number: 113
|
Date of Filing: 16-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 14-06-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Vijay Goyal
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh Execution Application NO. 37 OF 2016in CC/577/2014Ashish Gupta Vs Spicejet Ltd. and another BEFORE: DR.MANJIT SINGH, PRESIDENT SURJEET KAUR, MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Vijay Goyal, Counsel for Comp...
Case Number: 37
|
Date of Filing: 29-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-12-2016
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Amit Punj, Adv.
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,U.T., CHANDIGARHAppeal No.:132 of 2016Date of Institution:28.04.2016Date of Decision:04.05.2016Spicejet Ltd., 319, Udyog Vihar, Phase-IV, Gurgaon – 122 016..…Appellant/Opposite Party No.2.Versus(1) Sh. Viney Vaid, S/o Sh. ...
Case Number: 132
|
Date of Filing: 28-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-05-2016
Court Name: West Tripura
Appelant Advocate Mr. B.Sutradhar,Mr.S. Das, Mr.D. Bhattacharya.
Respondant Advocate Mr. P. Deb
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSSAL FORUM WEST TRIPURA : AGARTALACASE NO: CC- 24 of 2015Dipankar Chakraborty, S/O- Late Manik Lal Chakraborty, Kadamtali, Krishnanagar, Agartala, West Tripura. ...........Complainant. ___VERSUS___1. Spicejet Ltd., Corporate Head Office, 31...
Case Number: 24
|
Date of Filing: 10-03-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-05-2016
Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMSISUVIHAR LANEVAZHUTHACAUDTHIRUVANANTHAPURAM695010Complaint Case No. CC/16/921. Shihabudeen A.HTC 68/61-1,manacadu,Tvpm...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Spicejet ltdudyog vihar,phase5,gurgoan,hariyana............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Shr...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 25-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2016
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-IIU.T. ChandigarhFINAL ORDERComplaint Case No. CC/112/20161. RampalS/o Sh. Maman Singh 2. Neeraj Dhuran S/o Sh. Rampal Both residents of H.No. 1091, Sector 23-B, Chandigarh............Complainant(s)Versus1. Spicejet Ltd.,Plot No. 319, Ud...
Case Number: 112
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2016
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate In person
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum-I, U.T., Chandigarh CONSUMER COMPLAINT NO. 331 OF 2015Rampal & anr. Vs SpiceJet Ltd. & anr.BEFORE: SURJEET KAUR, PRESIDING MEMBER SURESH KUMAR SARDANA, MEMBERPRESENT: Sh.Rampal,Complainant No.1 in person,Father of Complainant No....
Case Number: 331
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 17-12-2016
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Spicejet in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Spicejet ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Spicejet under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.