Spicejet
Latest Judgments
Total 259 Consumer Court Cases Against Spicejet.
Spicejet Ltd V/S Amandeep Singh Bhangu
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate Charanpal Singh bagri
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:CC/647/2016Date of Institution:12/08/2016Date of Decision:03/07/2017Amandeep Singh Bhangu S/o Sh. Rajinder Singh, R/o H.No.3033, Sector 71, S.A.S. Nagar, Mohali.….ComplainantVs.[...
Case Number: 647
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-07-2017
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, SPICEJET LTD V/S TARSEM GARG
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate COMPLAINANT IN PERSON.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA. Consumer Complaint No:309 of 2016Date of Institution:21.11.2016Date of Decision:01.06.2017Mr.Tarsem Garg, H.No.1641, Sector-4, Panchkula. ….ComplainantVersus1. The Managing Director, Spicejet Ltd., 319, Udy...
Case Number: 309
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-06-2017
SUNIL KUMAR BATKOTIA V/S SPICEJET LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate AMIT PUNJ
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULAFirst Appeal No.837 of 2016Date of the Institution:14.09.2016Date of Decision:18.05.2017Manager, Spicejet Ltd., 319, Udyog vihar, Phase-IV, Gurgaon, Haryana. .….AppellantVersusSunil Kumar Bhatotia, S/o Sh.Om Pa...
Case Number: 837
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-07-2017
RAJENDRA KUMAR GUPTA V/S M/S. SPICEJET LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT PUNJ & MR. MAIBAM N. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3536 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 05/08/2016 in Appeal No. 741/2012 of the State Commission Delhi)1. M/S. SPICEJET LTD.319 UDYOGVIHAR, PHASE-IV, GURGAONHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. RAJEND...
Case Number: 3536
|
Date of Filing: 21-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2017
MOHINDER SINGH V/S SPICEJET LTD.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate CHAND DEEP JINDAL
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, HARYANA PANCHKULA First appeal No.707 of 2015Date of the Institution: 28.08.2015Date of Decision: 02.05.2017Spicejet Ltd. Through Sr. Manager (Legal), 319, Udyog Vihar, Phase-IV, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. .….AppellantsVersusMohi...
Case Number: 707
|
Date of Filing: 28-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 13-12-2017
Mr. Deepankar Chakraborty V/S Spicejet Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Mr. B.N Majumder, Mr. J.Chakraborty, Mr. R.Saha, Mr. D.J. Saha
Respondant Advocate Mr. Arghya Kusum Paul, Mr. Debaloy Bhattacharjee
Tripura State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Agartala.Case No.A.40.2016SpiceJet Ltd.,319 Udyog Vihar, Phase-IV,Gurgaon-12206, Haryana.Station Manager,SpiceJet Ltd.Agartala Airport, Agartala-799009.… … … … Appellants/Opposite Parties.Shri Deepa...
Case Number: 40
|
Date of Filing: 22-09-2016
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2017
Sanyam Aggarwal V/S Spicejet Ltd.
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Saurabh Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 515
|
Date of Filing: 05-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2017
Spicejet Limited, V/S Saneev Kumar Mishra,
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 264
|
Date of Filing: 16-02-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2017
SUJATA CHAUDHARY V/S SPICEJET LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT PUNJ & MR. MAIBAM N. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3557 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 05/10/2016 in Appeal No. 938/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. SPICEJET LTD.319, UDYOG VIHAR, PHAS - IV, GURGAON - 122016...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. SU...
Case Number: 3557
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2017
SANJAY RAHAR V/S SPICEJET LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT PUNJ & MR. MAIBAM N. SINGH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3558 OF 2016(Against the Order dated 05/10/2016 in Appeal No. 939/2016 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. SPICEJET LTD.319, UDYOG VIHAR PHAS - IV, GURGAON GURGAON - 122016...........Petitioner(s)Vers...
Case Number: 3558
|
Date of Filing: 23-12-2016
|
Date of Upload: 03-03-2017
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Spicejet in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Spicejet ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Spicejet under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.