company-name-logo

Sony

Latest Judgments

Total 2095 Consumer Court Cases Against Sony.

Uttar Pradesh

Life Insurance Corporation of India V/S Rakesh Kumar Sony

Life Insurance Corporation   Sony   Life Insurance   Life Insurance   Insurance  

Court Name: Varanasi

Appelant Advocate S. K. Dubey

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 45

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2023

|

Date of Upload: 23-03-2023

Orissa

The Managing Director Sony India pvt.Ltd V/S Mr,Ajit Yadav

Sony  

Court Name: Jharsuguda

Appelant Advocate Self

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 31

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2015

|

Date of Upload: 24-03-2023

Kerala

SONY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED V/S GEORGE V.P.

Sony  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate G.BAIJU

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/15/703( Date of Filing : 21 Oct 2015 )1. GEORGE V.P.VADAKKUMCHERY HOUSE,212-A,ALANGAD P.O.,ERNAKULAM DIST,PIN-683511...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDA-31,MOHAN CO-OPERATIVE INDUS...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 21-10-2015

|

Date of Upload: 31-03-2023

Uttar Pradesh

Agencies Malik rice V/S Hanuman sony

Sony  

Court Name: Faizabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 172

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2018

|

Date of Upload: 20-03-2023

Orissa

Sony India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi V/S Sri Ratikanta Parida, aged 40 years

Sony  

Court Name: Baleshwar

Appelant Advocate Sj. Keshaba Kumar Acharya & others

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BALASOREAT- KATCHERY HATA, NEAR COLLECTORATE, P.O, DIST- BALASORE-756001Complaint Case No. CC/70/2018( Date of Filing : 27 Nov 2018 )1. Sri Ratikanta Parida, aged 40 yearsS/o. Ekadosi Parida, At- Pandarungi, P.O- Baharda,P.S- Basta...

Case Number: 70

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2018

|

Date of Upload: 17-03-2023

Kerala

SONY INDIA V/S JITHESH T K

Sony  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/17/444( Date of Filing : 10 Nov 2017 )1. JITHESH T K33 YEARS ACHUTHAN T K DREAMS 6/1/C KANINADU P O PIN 682310 ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SONY INDIA A 18 MOHAN CO-OPERATIVE INDUSTRIAL ESTATE MATHURA...

Case Number: 17

|

Date of Filing: 10-11-2017

|

Date of Upload: 12-05-2023

Haryana

Sony India Pvt. Ltd. V/S Dr. Hemant Kumar Yadav

Sony  

Court Name: Rewari

Appelant Advocate Complainant in person

Respondant Advocate Sh. Ramesh Yadav

Case Number: 56

|

Date of Filing: 12-02-2021

|

Date of Upload: 10-03-2023

Delhi

SONY INDIA PVT.LTD. V/S VINOD BHAI

Sony  

Court Name: North West

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NORTH-WEST GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICSC-BLOCK-C, POCKET-C, SHALIMAR BAGH, DELHI-110088.Complaint Case No. CC/346/2020( Date of Filing : 19 Oct 2020 )1. VINOD BHAIS/O SH.CHAMAN BHAI R/O A-840,JAHANGIRPURI,DELHI-110033...........Complaina...

Case Number: 346

|

Date of Filing: 19-10-2020

|

Date of Upload: 03-04-2023

Tamil Nadu

The Chief Executive Officer, M/s. Sony India Pvt Ltd and Another's V/S Mr.B.S.Ramakrishnan

Sony  

Court Name: The Nilgiris

Appelant Advocate Mr.PL Sathish Kumar

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 81

|

Date of Filing: 17-06-2022

|

Date of Upload: 21-02-2023

Delhi

SONY INDIA V/S VIPUL TANWAR

Sony  

Court Name: East Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION (EAST)GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHICONVENIENT SHOPPING CENTRE, FIRST FLOOR, SAINI ENCLAVE, DELHI – 110 092C.C. No.162/2017 Sh. Vipul TanwarS/o Shri Naresh Kumar Resident of 75-76, Gali No.7, West Guru Angad Nagar, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-1...

Case Number: 162

|

Date of Filing: 27-04-2017

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Sony in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Sony ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Sony under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.