Software
Latest Judgments
Total 292 Consumer Court Cases Against Software.
M.s. Aliens Developers Pvt.limited V/S Asif Masood, Son of Ahmed Mohiuddin, Aged about 34 years, Occupation Senior Software Engineer
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M.s.Mahmood Ali
Respondant Advocate Mr.A.Krishnam Raju Op1 to OP3
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaComplaint Case No. CC/96/20141. Asif Masood, Son of Ahmed Mohiuddin, Aged about 34 years, Occupation Senior Software EngineerH.No.12.2.825 by 826 by A to F, Flat No.101, SGM Maphar, Mehdipatnam, Hyderabad...........Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 96
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2014
|
Date of Upload: 24-06-2016
VEERMATI SOFTWARE V/S R A COMMUNICATION
Court Name: Rampur
Appelant Advocate K. K. AGARWAL
Respondant Advocate K.K. SAXENA
Case Number: 142
|
Date of Filing: 29-01-2011
|
Date of Upload: 04-05-2016
SRINIVAS PUDU V/S SOFTWARE ENGINEERS EMPLOYEES HOUSING AND WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/S. LAWYER'S KNIT & CO.
Respondant Advocate MR. Y. SURESH KUMAR
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2092 OF 2015(Against the Order dated 15/09/2014 in Appeal No. 51/2013 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh)1. SOFTWARE ENGINEERS EMPLOYEES HOUSING AND WELFARE ASSOCIATION & ANR.FLAT NO-ANI/06/02, BLO...
Case Number: 2092
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 21-04-2016
Artifact Software and Finance Co Ltd V/S National Insurance Co. Ltd
National Insurance Software Finance Finance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate ADV.MR.ANTHONY
Respondant Advocate Adv.
...
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 16-06-2004
|
Date of Upload: 22-04-2016
Shashi Kumar Son of Keshav Ram aged about 41 Years, Occ Govt Employee, V/S 1. K. Balajirao Son Chandraiah, Aged about 39 Years, Occ Software Engineer R.o. 15.11.19 by 2 by 3 by B, Saleemnagar Colony, Malakpet Hyderabad
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. N. Srinivasa Rao
Respondant Advocate M/s. Y . Krishna Mohan Rao
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaFirst Appeal No. A/487/2014(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/08/2013 in Case No. CC/196/2012 of District Rangareddi)1. 1. K. Balajirao Son Chandraiah, Aged about 39 Years, Occ Software Engineer R.o. 15.11.19 by 2 by 3 by B, Saleemnagar ...
Case Number: 487
|
Date of Filing: 15-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 20-04-2016
M/s. Maytas Properties Limited (Now Known as Hill Country Properties Limited), Regd. Office at Bachu V/S Sanjay Thota S/o. T. Anil Kumar Aged about 37 Years, Occ: Software Employee,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/s. Prabhakar Sripada
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaExecution Application No. EA/8/2014In1. Sanjay Thota S/o. T. Anil Kumar Aged about 37 Years, Occ: Software Employee, R/o. Flat No.A-124, Western Plaza O.U. Staff Colony, Dargah Hussain Shawali (Near Manikonda) Hyderabad............A...
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2014
|
Date of Upload: 10-05-2016
PERFECT SOFTWARE V/S OMIYA VIJAY SO MEEL
Court Name: Kheda
Appelant Advocate A B JHALA
Respondant Advocate V K BHATYA
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 14-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 08-02-2016
Satyam Software Centre V/S Kamal Kishor Sati
Court Name: Nainital
Appelant Advocate Mr T S Chilwal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 30-09-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-02-2016
The Sr Manager(Network Development) Research Software RSS Solution (P) Ltd and ors. V/S Jayanta Basu S/o Monoj Kr Basu and ors.
Court Name: North 24 Parganas
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 269
|
Date of Filing: 08-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 02-12-2015
Aemolation Software Tecnology Pvt. Ltd V/S 277/2015 Smt. Sumsta Chaudhary
Court Name: Ganganagar
Appelant Advocate LALIT GOUR
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 29-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 26-11-2015
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Software in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Software ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Software under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.