Software
Latest Judgments
Total 294 Consumer Court Cases Against Software.
CMPL Pvt. Ltd., V/S M/S Mark Systems Software Pvt. Ltd.,
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Lovedeep Singh Sodhi Adv.
Respondant Advocate
Dated :24/04/2017ORDER Called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. Earlier Sh. Lovedeep Singh Sodhi was the counsel in this case. On 16.03.2016, Ms. Palak Dev, counsel for the complainant has appeared in this case and filed her Vakalat...
Case Number: 643
|
Date of Filing: 06-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 25-04-2017
Ms. Aliens Developers Pvt. Ltd., rep by its Managing Director Hari Challa, Son of C.V.R. Chowdhary, V/S Mrs. Soma Priya D.o. P.K. Sinha Aged about 35 Years, Occ Software Professional,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. S. Prashanth Kumar
Respondant Advocate M/s. A.Krishnam Raju OP1 and OP2
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaComplaint Case No. CC/149/20141. Mrs. Soma Priya D.o. P.K. Sinha Aged about 35 Years, Occ Software Professional,R.o. Flat No.204, Block 37, Raintree Apartments Malaysian Township KPHB 5th Phase, Hyderabad 500 072...........Complaina...
Case Number: 149
|
Date of Filing: 18-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 12-05-2017
FSL SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES LTD V/S BST ELTROMAT INDIA PVT LTD
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate LEGALEYE ASSOCIATES
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICTADMINISTRATIVE BLDG, NEAR DR.BABASAHEB AMBEDKAR GARDEN , BANDRA (E), MUMBAI-400051Complaint Case No. CC/475/20161. BST ELTROMAT INDIA PVT LTDTHORUGH ITS OFFICER 801, SRI KRSHNA,NEW LINK RD,ANDHERI WEST,MUMBAI-400053.........
Case Number: 475
|
Date of Filing: 27-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-04-2017
ARTH BROAD BAND SOFTWARE NETWORK V/S DAXESH J.KAPADIYA
Court Name: Surat Addl
Appelant Advocate pankaj shah
Respondant Advocate SELF
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2016
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2017
Ankur Roy,Manager,Bhash software Labs V/S Munesh Choudhary
Court Name: Nagaur
Appelant Advocate Sh R K Dhaka
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Execution Application No. EA/6/2017InComplaint Case No. CC/172/20161. Munesh ChoudharyMolasar,deedwanaNagaurRajasthan...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Ankur Roy,Manager,Bhash software Labsnew 63rd cross road,rv nagar anna nagar,east chennai...........Respondent(s) B...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 17-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 03-04-2017
1. Ms. Alien Developers Private Limited, Having its registered office at Flat No.911, Teja Block, My V/S 1. Prakash Sayini Son of Jagannadhan, Aged about 45 Years, Occ software Engineer,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. M. Hari Babu
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaComplaint Case No. CC/237/20141. 1. Prakash Sayini Son of Jagannadhan, Aged about 45 Years, Occ software Engineer,R.o. H.No.1.8.700 by 14, Behind Shankar Mutt, Nallakunta Hyderabad2. 2. Pedduri Aruradha Wife of Prakash Sayini, Aged ...
Case Number: 237
|
Date of Filing: 01-09-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-03-2017
Bluebridge Software Pvt. Ltd. V/S Marathwada Khadi Gramodyog Samiti
Court Name: Nanded
Appelant Advocate Adv. P. K. Patani
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 07-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 17-02-2017
Mills Software Solutions Pvt,Ltd. V/S Wodehouse Capital Advisors Pvt.Ltd.
Court Name: Central Mumbai
Appelant Advocate B.L. Kapadia
Respondant Advocate -
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 01-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-12-2016
V.Prabha, W/o V.Vasudeva Rao V/S P.Umesh, S/o S.Nasar, Software Engineer,
Court Name: Chittoor-II at triputi
Appelant Advocate K.Ajey Kumar
Respondant Advocate exparte
Filing Date:-10-06-2016 Order Date: 28-12-2016BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II, CHITTOOR...
Case Number: 65
|
Date of Filing: 10-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2019
M/s Intellvisions Software Ltd V/S Baba Farid Vidyak Society, (Registered), Bathinda
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ashok Jindal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 556
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 28-12-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Software in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Software ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Software under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.