Software Society Cooperative Society Cooperative
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri. M.K. Shetty
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM , I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/601/2019( Date of Filing : 04 Apr 2019 )1. Smt. Praveena AjayW/o. Sri Ajay Kumar Aged b...
Case Number: 601
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2019
Software Society Cooperative Society Cooperative
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri. M.K. Shetty
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM , I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/604/2019( Date of Filing : 04 Apr 2019 )1. Sri. Ajay Kumar............Complainant(s)Ver...
Case Number: 604
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2019
Software Society Cooperative Society Cooperative Society Cooperative
Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional
Appelant Advocate Sri. M.K. Shetty
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE BENGALURU RURAL AND URBAN I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM , I FLOOR, BMTC, B BLOCK, TTMC BUILDING, K.H.ROAD, SHANTHI NAGAR, BENGALURU-27Complaint Case No. CC/603/2019( Date of Filing : 04 Apr 2019 )1. Sri. Ajay KumarS/o Late PVS Nair Aged bout 4...
Case Number: 603
|
Date of Filing: 04-04-2019
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Inderjeet Choudhary
Respondant Advocate Sanjeev Arora
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,RAJASTHAN,JAIPUR BENCH NO.1COMPLAINT CASE NO: 29/2017M/s.Compucom Software Ltd., regd.office IT, 14-15 EPIP RIICO Industrial Area, Sitapura, Jaipur.Vs.United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Divisional Office at DO-4, Shopping Center, Amb...
Case Number: 29
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2017
|
Date of Upload: 05-03-2019
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate Sanjit Acharya
Respondant Advocate
The case of the complainant Bibekananda Paitandi in brief is that on 05.02.2017 he purchased a Motorola Mobile being Model No. XT1550 at price of Rs.9000/- from O.P Dip & Jit Telecom of Muktipur, Birbhum manufactured by Motorola.From the first day of purchase of the Mobile Ph...
Case Number: 70
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2018
|
Date of Upload: 21-01-2019
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. B. RAJESH
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI TRANSFER APPLICATION NO. 47 OF 20171. WIN WRENCH SOFTWARE SOLUTIONSTHROUGH ITS THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, THEJASWINI BUILDING 1 FLOOR, TECHNO PARK CAMPUS, TRIVANDRUM KERALA...........Appellants(s)Versus1. VANDEEP SINGH SAHNI & ...
Case Number: 47
|
Date of Filing: 14-12-2017
|
Date of Upload: 15-01-2019
Court Name: Kolkata-III(South)
Appelant Advocate Sandeepa Rai
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL FORUMKOLKATA UNIT-III(South),West Bengal18, Judges Court Road, Kolkata 700027Complaint Case No. CC/388/2017( Date of Filing : 13 Jul 2017 )1. Wasim Ansari Proprietor Of M/s. Ansari Cable SystemR-101, S.A. Farooque Rd, P.S. Metiabruz Kol-24...........Com...
Case Number: 388
|
Date of Filing: 13-07-2017
|
Date of Upload: 10-01-2019
Court Name: Birbhum
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Complainant files hazira and evidence on affidavit and Complainant files a petition to treat his evidence on affidavit as argument. The petition be treated be as M.A Case No. 148/2018. Heard, the Ld. Advocate/Agent of the Complainant. Perused the record and documents. The prayer ...
Case Number: 148
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2018
|
Date of Upload: 02-01-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Ms. G. Sathyaveer Reddy
Respondant Advocate Mr.A.Krishnam Raju
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMTelanganaComplaint Case No. CC/172/2014( Date of Filing : 17 May 2014 )1. 1. T.D. Srinivasan, Son of T.J.Dattathrian, aged 35 Years, Occ Software EngineerR.o. H.No.4.225, Geetha Nagar, Malakajgiri, Hyderabad, presently residing at 854, Would...
Case Number: 172
|
Date of Filing: 17-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2019
Court Name: Jaipur-II
Appelant Advocate Ramdev Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 77
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2017
|
Date of Upload: 01-11-2018
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Software in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Software ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Software under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.