company-name-logo

Snapdeal

Latest Judgments

Total 239 Consumer Court Cases Against Snapdeal.

Karnataka

Snapdeal V/S Sri.Sanjit Mohanty

Snapdeal  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate

BANGALORE URBAN DIST.CONSUMERDISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,8TH FLOOR,BWSSB BLDG.K.G.ROAD,BANGALORE560 009Complaint Case No. CC/14/18051. Sri.Sanjit MohantyS/o. B.B.P. Mohanty,R/at.Flat No. 402, R.K. Hoyasala Residency, Block 12B, 3rd Main, 9th Cross, Hoyasala Nagar, Bangalore-16.........

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 25-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-07-2015

Karnataka

Sri. Manishkumar Snapdeal com V/S P.Venkateshwarrao S/o. P.Narasimhamurthy

Snapdeal  

Court Name: Raichur

Appelant Advocate Sri. T.M. Swamy

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 15-11-2014

|

Date of Upload: 17-09-2016

Punjab

Snapdeal V/S Harmail Singh

Snapdeal  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABExecution Application No. EA/15/22InComplaint Case No. CC/14/4231. Harmail Singhson of Ishar singh r/o Kartar Basti st.No.2,Bathinda...........Appella...

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 16-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 17-04-2015

Punjab

Snapdeal Corporate V/S Lakshay Malhotra

Snapdeal  

Court Name: Firozpur

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate Randip Sandhu

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 01-10-2014

|

Date of Upload: 02-05-2015

Punjab

Snapdeal V/S Nikhil Bansal

Snapdeal  

Court Name: Sangrur

Appelant Advocate Shri Rajinder Goyal

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 005 Instituted on: 02.01.2015 Decided on: 26.03.2015Nikhil Bansal son of Shri Vinod Kumar Bansal R/o Gobindpura Colony, Street No.4, Near Railway Station, Sangrur. ..Complainant VersusSnapdeal, 246, First F...

Case Number: 5

|

Date of Filing: 02-01-2015

|

Date of Upload: 07-04-2015

Punjab

Snapdeal V/S Harmail Singh

Snapdeal  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Final Order of DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D, Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001PUNJABComplaint Case No. CC/14/4231. Harmail Singhson of Ishar singh r/o Kartar Basti st.No.2,Bathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SnapdealExt.444240 O...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 14-07-2014

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

SNAPDEAL JASPER INFOTECH PVT. LTD. NEW DELHI , SUMAN ENTERPRISES NEW DELHI V/S TRIVEDI VISHALBHAI GAJANANDBHAI

Snapdeal  

Court Name: Surendranagar

Appelant Advocate SHATUBHA VAGHELA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 13-05-2014

|

Date of Upload: 15-09-2020

Goa

Snapdeal Spinel Tradecom Pvt.Ltd. V/S Mr.Mikhil Mahendra Natekar

Snapdeal  

Court Name: North Goa

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM NORTH GOA, PORVORIM,GOAComplaint Case No. CC/13/701. Mr.Mikhil Mahendra NatekarS/o Mahendra Natekar, H No. 2025, Sastiwada Bordem, Bicholim-Goa............Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal Spinel Tradecom Pvt.Ltd.Khasra No. 10/13/1 & 10/...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 01-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Chandigarh

Snapdeal Private Limited Company V/S Ashok Kumar

Snapdeal  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 39 of 2013 1. Ashok KumarHouse No. 3045/1, Sector 41-D, Chandigarh ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 07 Ju...

Case Number: 39

|

Date of Filing: 28-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Snapdeal in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Snapdeal ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Snapdeal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.