Snapdeal
Latest Judgments
Total 242 Consumer Court Cases Against Snapdeal.
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 27-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 30-11-2017
M/s Snapdeal (Online Shopping company) V/S Ashok Gautam
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate
Dated :30/09/2016ORDER Today, an application for the dismissal of the complaint has been filed by the learned counsel for the OP -1. Sh. Ashok Gautam, complainant has appended a note on the first page of the complaint that he withdraws this complaint with liberty to file fresh. I...
Case Number: 515
|
Date of Filing: 21-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 15-12-2016
The CEO., Snapdeal 246 1st Floor OIA Phase-lll,Delhi-110020 & Another V/S Bansidhar Badatya
Court Name: Nabarangapur
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Mr R.P.Patra, Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NABARANGPURHeading 2Complaint Case No. CC/173/2016( Date of Filing : 11 Jul 2016 )1. Bansidhar BadatyaC/O Bikram Padhi,Main Road, Po./Dist- Nabarangpur, Odisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The CEO., Snapdeal 246 1st Floor OIA Phase-...
Case Number: 173
|
Date of Filing: 11-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2019
Bangalore Snapdeal Office V/S Vijay P. Nikose
Court Name: Nagpur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5th Floor, Civil Lines,Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/716/20151. Vijay P. NikoseAshirwad Nagar Plot No1915 Nagpur 24NagpurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Bangalore Snapdeal ...
Case Number: 716
|
Date of Filing: 17-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2016
Snapdeal V/S Shyo Parkash
Court Name: Hisar
Appelant Advocate Sudhir Kumar
Respondant Advocate PK Manchanda
Case Number: 267
|
Date of Filing: 19-08-2015
|
Date of Upload: 10-04-2017
Snapdeal V/S Aloyious Philip
Court Name: Kottayam
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, KottayamKottayamComplaint Case No. CC/126/20161. Aloyious PhilipMuttathil (h) Kallara P.O.KottayamKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal246, 1st Floor, Phase 111New Delhi2. The ManagerSBT Kallara P.O.KottayamKerala............Opp.Party...
Case Number: 126
|
Date of Filing: 19-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 19-10-2016
SNAPDEAL V/S RAJESHWARI GAUR
Court Name: Jaipur-II
Appelant Advocate Saroj Sharma
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 974
|
Date of Filing: 28-07-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-09-2016
Snapdeal .Com V/S Swarna Rani W/o Kharati Lal
Court Name: Yamunanagar
Appelant Advocate Tarun Rohilla
Respondant Advocate Raj Kumar OP No.1,Harender Kumar OP No.3
Swarna Rani vs. Snapdeel.CC No. 90 of 2016.Present: Sh. Tarun Rohilla, Advocate, counsel for complainant Sh. Raj Kumar, Advocate, counsel for Op No.1. Sh. Harinder Kumar, Advocate, counsel for applicant/OP No.3. OP No.4 already ex-parte. Sh. Harinder Kumar Advocate, filed an a...
Case Number: 90
|
Date of Filing: 18-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-08-2016
Snapdeal V/S Neelam Sharma
Court Name: Moga
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.K.Sharma
Respondant Advocate Sh.Amit Goyal
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MOGA. CC No. 77 of 2016 Instituted on: 08.03.2016 Decided on: 21.06.2016Neelam Sharma wife of Swaranjit Sharma, resident of 617, Street no.2, Dashmesh Nagar, Moga - 142001. ……… ComplainantVersusSnapde...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 08-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 06-07-2016
Snapdeal V/S Tarundeep Singh
Court Name: Amritsar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumSCO 100, District Shopping Complex, Ranjit AvenueAmritsarPunjabComplaint Case No. CC/15/3301. Tarundeep Singh1774, Gali Arorian Wali, Hall Bazar, AmritsarAmritsarPunjab...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal246, Okhla Industrial Estate...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 21-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 07-06-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Snapdeal in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Snapdeal ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Snapdeal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.