Snapdeal
Latest Judgments
Total 242 Consumer Court Cases Against Snapdeal.
Snapdeal V/S Santosh Kumar Sharma
Court Name: Purbi Singhbhum
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate Mr. D. Rajesh Patnaik and Ruby Prasad
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/88/2013( Date of Filing : 28 Oct 2013 )1. Santosh Kumar SharmaQr.No-19 , L4 Cross road , Agrico , JamshedpurPurbi SinghbhumJharkhand...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Snapdeal240, Ground Floor , Okhla Indusrtial Estate Phase II , New DelhiDelh...
Case Number: 88
|
Date of Filing: 28-10-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-10-2019
SNAPDEAL V/S MANOJ KUMAR
Court Name: West Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM (WEST)GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI150-151, Community Centre, C-Block, Janak Puri, New Delhi – 110058 Date of institution :17.10.16Complaint Case No. 671/16 Date of order :14.12.16 In the matter of :Manoj Kumar Complainant Vs.SNAPDEAL....
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 17-10-2016
|
Date of Upload: 02-02-2017
SNAPDEAL V/S Syeda Sharmeen Afza
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate Inperson
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 12-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 16-12-2016
Case Number: 8
|
Date of Filing: 04-07-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-11-2019
General Manager Snapdeal Infotech Pvt. Ltd. V/S Sri Ranendra Manna
Court Name: Paschim Midnapore
Appelant Advocate Mr. Rabindranath Singh
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMPASCHIM MEDINIPUR.Bibekananda Pramanik, President,Mrs. Debi Sengupta, MemberandKapot Kumar ChattopadhyayComplaint Case No.125/2016Sri Ranendra Manna S/o-Radhakrishna Manna,Vill-Mahatabpur, P.O.-Midnapore, P.S.-Kotwali,Dist-Paschim Medinip...
Case Number: 125
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-03-2017
SNAPDEAL JASPER INFOTECH PVT.LTD. V/S R.K JAIN.
Court Name: Panchkula
Appelant Advocate VIJAY GOYAL.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, PANCHKULA.Consumer Complaint No:128of 2016Date of Institution:26.05.2016Date of Decision:24.11.2016Raj Kumar Jain resident of House No. 2961, Sector-15, Panchkula. ….ComplainantVersusJasper Infotech Pvt. Ltd., Okhla In...
Case Number: 128
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2016
|
Date of Upload: 28-11-2016
The CEO., Snapdeal 246 1st Floor OIA Phase-lll,Delhi-110020 & Another V/S Mrs. Sibani Satapathy
Court Name: Nabarangapur
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate Mr R.P.Patra, Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NABARANGPURHeading 2Complaint Case No. CC/211/2016( Date of Filing : 10 Aug 2016 )1. Mrs. Sibani SatapathyAt- Main Road, C/o Sri Bikram Padhi, Near Block Office, Po/Ps/Dist- Nabarangpur ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The CEO., Snapde...
Case Number: 211
|
Date of Filing: 10-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2019
Snapdeal V/S Raghubir Singh
Court Name: Firozpur
Appelant Advocate Sukhbeer Singh
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 300
|
Date of Filing: 09-06-2016
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2016
Snapdeal V/S Neelam Sharma
Court Name: Moga
Appelant Advocate Sh. S.K.Sharma
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, DISTRICT ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX,ROOM NOS. B209-B214, BEAS BLOCK, MOGAExecution Application No. EA/16/17InComplaint Case No. CC/16/771. Neelam Sharmaw/o Swaranjit Sharma r/o 617, St. No.2, Dashmesh Nagar, MogaMogaPunjab...........Appella...
Case Number: 16
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2016
|
Date of Upload: 23-12-2016
Snapdeal . com V/S Jai Kathuria
Court Name: Sangrur
Appelant Advocate Shri Mohit Verma
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, SANGRUR. Complaint No. 350 Instituted on: 11.04.2016 Decided on: 14.10.2016Jai Kathuria son of Shri Ashwani Kumar, resident of H.No.37, Gali No.4, New Friends Colony, Sangrur. …Complainant Versus1. Snapdeal.com, 1st floor, 246, ...
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 11-04-2016
|
Date of Upload: 18-10-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Snapdeal in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Snapdeal ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Snapdeal under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.