Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S SYED NAIMULLAH
Respondant Advocate M/s.A.P.Venugopal-1 to 3
Complaint Case No. CC/34/20121. J. VENKATARAMANA MURTHY, S/O LATE J. JAGANNADHA RAO, 8-6-1/4,NALLAM BHEEMA RAJU VEEDHI, T.NAGAR, RAJAHMUNDRY, E.G.DIST............Complainant(s)Versus1. 1. SKODA AUTO INDIA PRIVATE LTD., REP BY MANAGING DIRECTOR, A-1/1,MIDC, FIVE STAR INDUSTRIAL AR...
Case Number: 34
|
Date of Filing: 24-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPIN SINGHANIA
Respondant Advocate MR. ANAND SANJAY M. NULI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2775 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 17/07/2012 in Appeal No. 3763/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. M/S. SKODA AUTO INDIA PVT. LTD.A-1/1 Five Star Industtrial Area Shendra MIDC AurangabadMahar...
Case Number: 2775
|
Date of Filing: 26-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-05-2013
Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/31/2013( Date of Filing : 24 Jan 2013 )1. M/s.Elespee Products Pvt. LtdBaikampady, Mangalore. Represented by its Manger, Mr.Ronald Fernandes,...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/...
Case Number: 31
|
Date of Filing: 24-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 24-12-2018
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ANUPAM DHINGRA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI FIRST APPEAL NO. 7 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 21/11/2012 in Complaint No. 56/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. BELMAKS SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.Through its Director Sh. Rajat Bhatia S/o. Sh. R.K. Bhatia, Plot No. 17D, ...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-04-2013
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. VIPIN SINGHANIA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 97 OF 2013 IN RP/522/20131. SKODA AUTO INDIA P LIMITED & ANR............Appellants(s)Versus1. MANU PURI...........Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.B. GUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBERHON'...
Case Number: 97
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 25-06-2013
Court Name: DF-II
Appelant Advocate Gaurav Bhardwaj
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 105 of 2012 1. Gireesh GoelR/o 3343, Sector 23/D, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. M/s Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd,Plot No. A-1/1, Shendra, F...
Case Number: 105
|
Date of Filing: 22-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate U B WAVIKAR
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/11/412(Arisen out of Order Dated 11/02/2011 in Case No. 635/2008 of District Mumbai(Suburban))1. MR ANOOP GUPTAR/AT 501-02 A WING KAILASH COMPLEX BUILDING 2 PARK SITE OFF HIRANA...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 16-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate S. MURALI
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/10/3971. SANTHA GRACE MATHEWW/O MATHEW,3A, LINK HORIZON, MARINE DRIVE KOCHI. ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S SKODA AUTO INDIA PRIVATE LIMITEDPLOT NO:A-1/1, SHENDRA, FIVE START INDUSTRIAL AREA, MIDIC,...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate VINOD MADHAVAN,
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/10/701. THERASA JOSEW/O AJAI JOSE, M/S COCHIN GRANITES, 17/691B, KARUMANCHERIL BUILDING, P.O.MUDAMVELI, KOCHI-7 Kerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/S SKODA AUTO INDIA PRIVATE LTDPLOT NO.A-1,SHENDRA, ...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Hyderabad-III
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1005
|
Date of Filing: 29-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 27-05-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Skoda in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Skoda ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Skoda under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.