Singapore Airlines
Latest Judgments
Total 32 Consumer Court Cases Against Singapore Airlines.
Singapore Airlines V/S GRK Reddy
Court Name: South Chennai
Appelant Advocate S.Natarajan
Respondant Advocate O.R.Santhanakrishnan
...
Case Number: 209
|
Date of Filing: 12-08-2011
|
Date of Upload: 10-06-2015
THE SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. V/S K. R. BALASUBRAMANIAM
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1189 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 30/01/2012 in Appeal No. 880/2010 of the State Commission Tamil Nadu)1. K. R. BALASUBRAMANIAMS/o P.Ramalimgam, Karthick Towers, 1to4 S.K.C Road IIIErode - 638009Tam...
Case Number: 1189
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 10-11-2014
SINGAPORE AIRLINES & ORS. V/S MS. LEE SU - HWA ALSO KNOWN AS TIMMY SUHWA LEE OR TIMY S. CHANG
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate Amit Lubhaya
Respondant Advocate M/S. K.J. JOHN & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 191 OF 20031. MS. LEE SU - HWA ALSO KNOWN AS TIMMY SUHWA LEE OR TIMY S. CHANGNO. 510 UNDERCLIFF AVE. EDGE WATR N.J. 07020 U.S.A............Complainant(s)Versus1. SINGAPORE AIRLINES & ORS.WESTMINISTER IST F...
Case Number: 191
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2003
|
Date of Upload: 04-07-2014
SINGAPORE AIRLINES & ORS. V/S MS. LEE SU - HWA ALSO KNOWN AS TIMMY SUHWA LEE OR TIMY S. CHANG
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate DR. MANISH SINGHVI & MR. AMIT LUBHAYA
Respondant Advocate M/S. K.J. JOHN & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 248 OF 2013 IN OP/191/20031. MS. LEE SU - HWA ALSO KNOWN AS TIMMY SUHWA LEE OR TIMY S. CHANG...........Appellants(s)Versus1. SINGAPORE AIRLINES & ORS............Respondent(s) BEFORE: HON'B...
Case Number: 248
|
Date of Filing: 18-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-08-2013
SINGAPORE AIRLINES & ORS. V/S MS. LEE SU - HWA ALSO KNOWN AS TIMMY SUHWA LEE OR TIMY S. CHANG
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate Amit Lubhaya
Respondant Advocate M/S. K.J. JOHN & CO.
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 191 OF 20031. MS. LEE SU - HWA ALSO KNOWN AS TIMMY SUHWA LEE OR TIMY S. CHANGNO. 510 UNDERCLIFF AVE. EDGE WATR N.J. 07020 U.S.A............Complainant(s)Versus1. SINGAPORE AIRLINES & ORS.WESTMINISTER IST F...
Case Number: 191
|
Date of Filing: 07-10-2003
|
Date of Upload: 05-04-2013
THE MANAGER, M/S SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. V/S V.A VARKEYKUNJU
Court Name: Ernakulam
Appelant Advocate TOM JOSEPH
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/11/2321. V.A VARKEYKUNJUVETTIKUZHA HOUSE, CHELADU P.O, KOTHAMANGALAMERNAKULAMKERALA...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE MANAGER, M/S SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD.WEST MINISTER, 1ST FLOOR 108, DR. RADHAKRISHNAN SALAI, MYLAPORE, CHENNAI - 6000042. M/S CREATIVE TOUR...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 10-05-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Singapore Airlines Unit # 514 A & B, Time Tower, M.G. Road, Gurgaon 122002 Haryana India V/S Varun Gupta
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Disctrict Consumer Redressal ForumChadigarhCONSUMER CASE NO. 791 of 2010 1. Varun GuptaS/o Sh. Roshan Lal Gupta R/o House No. 258 Sector-10 Panchkula-134109 ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : 23 Jan 2012 ORDER BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER D...
Case Number: 791
|
Date of Filing: 29-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD, V/S MR NOORMOHMED A.R. MULLA
Court Name: Mumbai(Suburban)
Appelant Advocate SHAH ALAM KHAN
Respondant Advocate CRAWFORD BAYLEY & CO.
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MUMBAI SUBURBAN DISTRICT.Admn. Bldg., 3rd Floor, Near Chetana College, Govt. Colony, Bandra(East), Mumbai-400 051.Complaint Case No. CC/04/60 1. MR NOORMOHMED A.R. MULLAFLAT NO. 5, 3RD FLOOR, ALMEIDA PARK, 10 TH ROAD, BANDRA-WEST, MUMBAI-50. ......
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 21-02-2004
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. & ANR. V/S M/S. ANANTH TECHNOLOGIES LTD.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. K.P.S. RAO,
Respondant Advocate MR. K.J. JOHN
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 287 OF 20021. M/S. ANANTH TECHNOLOGIES LTD.PLOT NO. 1299 K, ROAD NO. 66, JUBILEE HILLS, HYDERABAD, ANDHRA PRADESH 500 033...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. & ANR.WEST MINISTER, 1ST F...
Case Number: 287
|
Date of Filing: 06-08-2002
|
Date of Upload: 18-03-2011
M/S. SINGAPORE AIRLINES LTD. & ANR. V/S MANOJ KUMAR MOHTA & ORS.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. RIKKY GUPTA
Respondant Advocate MR. P.C. SHARMA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 752 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 27/10/2009 in Appeal No. 214/2009 of the State Commission West Bengal) 1. MANOJ KUMAR MOHTA & ORS.R/o. 14C, Dobson RoadHowrah - 711101West Bengal2. SHRI ASHOK KUMAR M...
Case Number: 752
|
Date of Filing: 15-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 08-04-2010
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Singapore Airlines in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Singapore Airlines ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Singapore Airlines under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.