company-name-logo

Shoes

Latest Judgments

Total 243 Consumer Court Cases Against Shoes.

Madhya Pradesh

Karan shoes V/S Ramdas Yadav

Shoes  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 15-03-2010

|

Date of Upload: 11-03-2016

Kerala

MANAGER METRO SHOES LTD, V/S P.T.ASSAIN KUTTY,

Shoes  

Court Name: Kozhikode

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CC NO. 176 Of 20111. P.T.ASSAIN KUTTY,S/O.P.T. ALIKUTTY HAJI,PEEDIKA THODUKAYIL HOUSE,KODUVALLY PO,KOZHIKODE............Complainant(s)Versus1. MANAGER METRO SHOES LTD,6/1131-F,WEST END MALL,C FLY OVER JUNCTION,CHEROOTTY ROAD,KOZHIKODE.673001.............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONOUR...

Case Number: 176

|

Date of Filing: 03-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

M\s Sylcon Sarah Shoes V/S Smt Geetha S

Shoes  

Court Name: Kottayam

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

KottayamConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Civil Station, KottayamCC NO. 173 Of 2010 1. Smt Geetha SAsst Mgr, Oriental Insurance Co LTd, Divisional Office, Ktym ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. M\s Sylcon Sarah ShoesMallcelhara Commercial Complex Baker Junc, Ktym ...........Respon...

Case Number: 173

|

Date of Filing: 17-07-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Bata Shoes Centre V/S Sri.B.T.Ramesh

Shoes   Bata Shoes  

Court Name: Mandya

Appelant Advocate B.T.Kamala

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANDYANo.2083/1, Subhash Nagar, 1st Cross, Mandya-571401consumer case(CC) No. CC/09/82 Sri.B.T.Ramesh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.Bata Shoes Centre ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Smt.A.P.Mahadevamma2. Sri.M.N.Manohara3. Sri.Siddegowda...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 10-07-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

The Proprietor, Manna Shoes V/S M.K.Ponnappa

Shoes  

Court Name: Kodagu

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)Execution Application(EA) No. EA/08/30 M.K.Ponnappa ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Proprietor, Manna Shoes ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. A.S.Hemalatha 2. K.S.Prasad C...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 27-11-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

SELECTION SHOES AND BAGS V/S K RAJATH

Shoes  

Court Name: Kozhikode

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

KOZHIKODECONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,CIVIL STATIONconsumer case(CC) No. CC/08/216 K RAJATH ...........Appellant(s)Vs.SELECTION SHOES AND BAGS ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. G YADUNADHAN2. JAYASREE KALLAT3. K.V.SREENIVASAN Complainant(s)/Appellant(s): OppositeParty/Res...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 07-07-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

The Manager M/s Milton Shoes V/S Manjunatha Gowda

Shoes  

Court Name: Bangalore Urban

Appelant Advocate MSB

Respondant Advocate

BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSLAL FORUM, BANGALORE, KARNATAKA STATE.Bangalore Urban District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Cauvery Bhavan, 8th Floor, BWSSB Bldg., K. G. Rd., Bangalore-09.consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/1864 Manjunatha Gowda ...........Appella...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 25-08-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

The Proprietor, Manna Shoes V/S M.K.Ponnappa

Shoes  

Court Name: Kodagu

Appelant Advocate In person

Respondant Advocate

THE KODAGU DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMShekar Complex, Mahadevapet, Madikeri-571201(Karnataka)consumer case(CC) No. CC/08/60 M.K.Ponnappa ...........Appellant(s)Vs.The Proprietor, Manna Shoes ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. A.S.Hemalatha 2. K.S.Prasad 3. M.R.Deva...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 09-07-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

Bata Shoes Store V/S R M Gajiya

Shoes   Bata Shoes  

Court Name: Rajkot

Appelant Advocate Y B Rathod

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 08-01-2007

|

Date of Upload: 03-08-2021

Madhya Pradesh

ROYAL SHOES V/S ARVIND RAYEKWAR

Shoes  

Court Name: Sagar

Appelant Advocate SHRI KULDEEP SHRIVASTAVA

Respondant Advocate

...

Case Number: 233

|

Date of Filing: 19-11-2007

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Shoes in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Shoes ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Shoes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.