company-name-logo

Shoes

Latest Judgments

Total 243 Consumer Court Cases Against Shoes.

Chandigarh

College Shoes (Woodland) V/S Abnesh Dhadwal

Shoes  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Comp. in person Gaurav Bhardwaj,Adv

Respondant Advocate Lalit Kumar

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIU.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No.:1029/2016Date of Institution:20.12.2016Date of Decision:06/03/2017 Abnesh Dhadwal r/o # 2361, Sector 19-C, Chandigarh ... Complainant.VersusCollege Shoes (Woodland), SCO No.30, Sector 17-E, Chandi...

Case Number: 1029

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2016

|

Date of Upload: 22-03-2017

Chandigarh

M/s College Shoes V/S Parvinder Kaur Grover

Shoes  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate In Person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-II,U.T. CHANDIGARHConsumer Complaint No:986 of 2016Date of Institution:30.11.2016Date of Decision:31.01.2017Parvinder Kaur Grover w/o Jaswinder Pal Singh Grover r/o H.No.1544, Phase-3B-2, Mohali 160059. …..ComplainantVersusM/s Col...

Case Number: 986

|

Date of Filing: 30-11-2016

|

Date of Upload: 21-02-2017

Gujarat

1) Liberty Shoes Ltd. V/S 1) Shri Yatin Raminklal Vadodariya

Shoes   Liberty Shoes  

Court Name: Rajkot

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 16

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2016

|

Date of Upload: 03-02-2017

Uttar Pradesh

Prakash Mohan Upadhayay V/S Satyam Boot Shoes

Shoes  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate V P Sharma

Respondant Advocate

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010First Appeal No. A/2008/727(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District )1. Satyam Boot Shoes a...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Prakash Mohan Upadhayaya...........

Case Number: 2008

|

Date of Filing: 10-04-2008

|

Date of Upload: 25-08-2017

Chandigarh

M/s Regal Shoes V/S Navdeep Singh

Shoes  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate In person

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH============Consumer Complaint No:412 of 2016Date of Institution:6.6.2016Date of Decision:2.1.2017Navdeep Singh s/o Sh. Iqbal Singh resident of H. No.974, Sector 9, Panchkula (Hry.) & Permanent resident of ward No.1...

Case Number: 412

|

Date of Filing: 06-06-2016

|

Date of Upload: 17-01-2017

Chandigarh

M/s College Shoes V/S Satbinder Singh

Shoes  

Court Name: DF-I

Appelant Advocate Sukaam Gupta

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-I, U.T. CHANDIGARH Consumer Complaint No.:CC/819/2016Date of Institution:16/09/2016Date of Decision:27/12/2016Satbinder Singh s/o Sh. Harmohinder Singh r/o #66, Sector 21-A, Chandigarh.…..ComplainantV E R S U S1. M/s College Shoes...

Case Number: 819

|

Date of Filing: 16-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 04-01-2017

Haryana

Liberty shoes V/S Sandeep

Shoes   Liberty Shoes  

Court Name: Bhiwani

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Yadav

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/100/20161. Sandeep s/o Sumer Singh v.p.o. Titani...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Liberty shoesOpp. Chug Hospital Bhiwani............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Rajesh Jindal PRESIDENTHON'BLE MRS. Anamika Gupta MEMBERHON'BLE MRS. Sudesh D...

Case Number: 100

|

Date of Filing: 16-05-2016

|

Date of Upload: 27-01-2017

Madhya Pradesh

Metro Shoes V/S Sanjay Soni

Shoes  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 15

|

Date of Filing: 05-03-2015

|

Date of Upload: 16-11-2016

Uttar Pradesh

LAKHANI SHOES AND APIRALS PVT. LTD. V/S RAKESH KUMAR TIWARI

Shoes  

Court Name: Mau

Appelant Advocate AJAY KUMAR SINGH

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 25-07-2015

|

Date of Upload: 22-11-2016

Telangana

Case Number: 176

|

Date of Filing: 12-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-11-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Shoes in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Shoes ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Shoes under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.