Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Girish.S.Hegde
Respondant Advocate
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.First Appeal No. A/1495/2018( Date of Filing : 25 Sep 2018 )(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/08/2018 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/138/2017 of District Chitradurga)1. Kalash Seeds Pvt.Ltd.P.O.Box No....
Case Number: 1495
|
Date of Filing: 25-09-2018
|
Date of Upload: 11-01-2023
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SH. S.K VERMA
Respondant Advocate MS. SAMBHAVNA RAJPUT
M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPALFIRST APPEAL NO. 2163 OF 2010(Arising out of order dated 26.08.2010 passed in C.C.No. 240/2009 by District Commission, Hoshangabad)SARTHAK AND AGRITECH,PROPRIETOR SHRI RAMLAKHAN MEENA,NAI GALLA MAN...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 28-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN
Respondant Advocate MR. GURUDATTA ANKOLEKAR & MR. PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2357 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/02/2014 in Appeal No. 1886/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. RASI SEEDS PVT. LTD.273 KAMARAJNAGAR ROAD, ATTUR, THROUGH ITS ATTORISED SIGNATORY, DISTRICT ...
Case Number: 2357
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate SH. YOGESH BHATNAGAR
Respondant Advocate SH. S.K VERMA
M. P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PLOT NO.76, ARERA HILLS, BHOPALFIRST APPEAL NO. 2163 OF 2010(Arising out of order dated 26.08.2010 passed in C.C.No. 240/2009 by District Commission, Hoshangabad)SARTHAK AND AGRITECH,PROPRIETOR SHRI RAMLAKHAN MEENA,NAI GALLA MAN...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 23-10-2010
|
Date of Upload: 22-11-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.Review Application No. RA/110/2022( Date of Filing : 03 Nov 2022 )InFirst Appeal No. A/709/20141. National Seeds Corporation Ltd.,U A S Compound, Hebbal, Bangalore 560024Rep. by Regional Manager.........
Case Number: 110
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2022
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN
Respondant Advocate MR. GURUDATTA ANKOLEKAR & MR. PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2357 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/02/2014 in Appeal No. 1886/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. RASI SEEDS PVT. LTD.273 KAMARAJNAGAR ROAD, ATTUR, THROUGH ITS ATTORISED SIGNATORY, DISTRICT ...
Case Number: 2359
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2022
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.Review Application No. RA/109/2022( Date of Filing : 03 Nov 2022 )InFirst Appeal No. A/708/20141. National Seeds Corporation Ltd.,U A S Compound, Hebbal, Bangalore 560024Rep. by Regional Manager.........
Case Number: 109
|
Date of Filing: 03-11-2022
|
Date of Upload: 14-12-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN
Respondant Advocate MR. GURUDATTA ANKOLEKAR & MR. PURUSHOTTAM SHARMA TRIPATHI
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 2357 OF 2014(Against the Order dated 07/02/2014 in Appeal No. 1886/2011 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. RASI SEEDS PVT. LTD.273 KAMARAJNAGAR ROAD, ATTUR, THROUGH ITS ATTORISED SIGNATORY, DISTRICT ...
Case Number: 2358
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2014
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2022
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. BUDDY A. RANGANADHAN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4598 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 03/09/2010 in Appeal No. 578/2009 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. RASI SEEDS PVT. LTD.174 SATHYMURTHY ROAD, RAMNAGAR, COIMBATORE - 641009A.P...........Pet...
Case Number: 4598
|
Date of Filing: 16-12-2010
|
Date of Upload: 21-11-2022
Court Name: Morena
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 190
|
Date of Filing: 15-06-2011
|
Date of Upload: 18-11-2022
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Seeds in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Seeds ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Seeds under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.