Seeds
Latest Judgments
Total 5642 Consumer Court Cases Against Seeds.
NATH SEEDS LTD. V/S SAW. SAROJ RAJESH SHAH
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate IN PERSON
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 1552 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 10/02/2010 in Appeal No. 1668/2000 of the State Commission Maharastra) 1. SAW. SAROJ RAJESH SHAHC/o. Dr. Rajesh Ramanlal Shah, 23, Tilak Road, Post Box No. 11, Maleg...
Case Number: 1552
|
Date of Filing: 26-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 13-07-2010
RAGHUNATHA REDDY & ANR. V/S PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3960 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 27/05/2009 in Appeal No. 589/2006 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) 1. PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.B-4. Greater Kailash Enclave. Part-II New Delhi -110048 ..............
Case Number: 3960
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2010
D. SANKAR REDDY & ANR. V/S PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3960 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 27/05/2009 in Appeal No. 589/2006 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) 1. PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.B-4. Greater Kailash Enclave. Part-II New Delhi -110048 ..............
Case Number: 3961
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2010
D. MAHESHWARA REDDY & ANR. V/S PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3960 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 27/05/2009 in Appeal No. 589/2006 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) 1. PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.B-4. Greater Kailash Enclave. Part-II New Delhi -110048 ..............
Case Number: 3962
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2010
G. VENKATRAMANA REDDY & ORS. V/S PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3960 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 27/05/2009 in Appeal No. 589/2006 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) 1. PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.B-4. Greater Kailash Enclave. Part-II New Delhi -110048 ..............
Case Number: 3963
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2010
M. VENKATESWARA REDDY & ANR. V/S PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. ADITYA NARAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. 3960 OF 2009(Against the Order dated 27/05/2009 in Appeal No. 589/2006 of the State Commission Andhra Pradesh) 1. PHI SEEDS LTD. & ANR.B-4. Greater Kailash Enclave. Part-II New Delhi -110048 ..............
Case Number: 3964
|
Date of Filing: 26-10-2009
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2010
M/s. Krishna Sai Seeds and Agro Implements, rep. by its Managing Partner. , Khammam. & another V/S Perumallapalli Yesu, S/o. Papaiah, Perumallapalli Yesu, S/o. Papaiah,R/o. Gate Karepalli Village, Singareni Mandal,
Court Name: Khammam
Appelant Advocate H. Sree Ram Rao, Advocate, Khammam.
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT KHAMMAMVaradaiah Nagar, Opp CSI Churchconsumer case(CC) No. CC/09/35 Perumallapalli Yesu, S/o. Papaiah, Perumallapalli Yesu, S/o. Papaiah,R/o. Gate Karepalli Village, Singareni Mandal, ...........Appellant(s)Vs.M/s. Krishna Sai Seeds and Agr...
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 09-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, KNOWN YOU SEEDS INDIA LTD. AND ORS V/S ASWATHANARAYANA REDDY
Court Name: Tumkur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 57
|
Date of Filing: 30-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 21-12-2019
Regional Manager, National Seeds Corporation Ltd. V/S Kumar Pd. Yadav,
Court Name: Patna
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 237
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2001
|
Date of Upload: 17-03-2022
Case Number: 129
|
Date of Filing: 26-05-2010
|
Date of Upload: 11-02-2021
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Seeds in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Seeds ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Seeds under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.