Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate A M duehane
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/11/1661. dilep Dharma Mali At Post varud...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Nirmal Seeds PVT .Ltd PachoraAt Post Pachora............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. V.V. Dani PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. S. S. Jain MEMBERHON'ABLE MR. S....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate a m dushane
Respondant Advocate L.P.Thakur
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. cc/11/1631. sr prakash dharma maliat post warul t shindkeda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. nirmal seeds p v t pacorapacora............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. V.V. Dani PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. S. S. Jain MEMBERHON'ABLE MR....
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate a m dushame
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEExecution Application No. cc/11/1641. sr vivake pandit kotkar A t post warud...........Appellant(s)Versus1. nirmal seeds p v t,ltd, pachora AT post Pachora...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. V.V. Dani PRESIDENTHON'ABLE MRS. S. S. Jain MEMBER...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 06-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Krishna at Vijaywada
Appelant Advocate B.Devadasu
Respondant Advocate M.Jitender Reddy
Complaint Case No. CC/52/20131. K.SatyanarayanaS/o Narasaiah, Hindu, aged about 40 years, Farmer, R/o Sanagapadu Village, Penuganchiprolu Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradeshf State ...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Sri Rajya Lakshmi Seeds and General Marchant, Rep, by its Pr...
Case Number: 52
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate G.P.Shinde
Respondant Advocate Adv.D.D.Shardul
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. FA/86/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 01/02/2012 in Case No. 75/2010 of District Dhule )1. Pro Agro Seeds Ltd.M/S.Bayer Bio ScienceOhri Tech Park,Plot No.13,Survey No.64/02...
Case Number: 86
|
Date of Filing: 02-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. MUKESH KUMAR SHARMA
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 527 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 12/11/2012 in Appeal No. 1032/2012 of the State Commission Haryana)1. DEV DUTTS/O SHRI DARITO SINGH, R/O VILLAGE P.O MOHANA, SONEPATHARYANA...........Petitioner(s)Ve...
Case Number: 527
|
Date of Filing: 11-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 11-07-2013
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate O S TRIPATI
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/124(Arisen out of Order Dated 06/01/2012 in Case No. CC/03/2011 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. MANGER, PANCHGANGA SEEDS PVT LTD 57 MIDC WALUNJ AURANGABAD AURANGABADMAHAR...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 08-02-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Representative K P Gavande
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001Revision Petition No. RP/12/28(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/07/2012 in Case No. EA/12/1 of District Akola )1. National Forum Fpr Con...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 21-08-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate O S TIPOLE
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/302(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/02/2012 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/12/62 of District Additional DCF, Pune)1. MANAGER, PANCHAGANGA SEEDS PVT LTD PLOT NO F-95 MIDC WALU...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 02-04-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate D v Gharte
Respondant Advocate O.S Tipole/Gharate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/11/361. NagrajAdhar Patil At Post Rudawali Tal Shirpur Dhule...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Manajar Green Gold Seeds Gut No 65 Gangapur Narayanpur Shivar Waluj Dist Aurangabad ............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'ABLE MRS. V.V. ...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 17-02-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Seeds in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Seeds ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Seeds under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.