Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Adv Dhoot
Respondant Advocate Adv Bedre
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. a/06/1608(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/06/2006 in Case No. cc/05/80 of District Additional DCF, Nagpur)1. Nuziveedu...
Case Number: 6
|
Date of Filing: 16-08-2006
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MS. AAKRITI JAIN
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 1114 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 20/02/2013 in Appeal No. 945/2012 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. MAYUR SEEDS CORPORATIONTHROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, NEAR RATH M.G ROAD, PACHHORAJALGAON....
Case Number: 1114
|
Date of Filing: 20-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-10-2013
Court Name: Parbhani
Appelant Advocate S.R.Magar 9423361428.
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/12/1321. Ramesh Dattatray JadhavR/o Karanji Tq.ManwatParbhaniMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Mahabaje Seeds Ltd.Krashi Nager,Akola and other3Krashi Nager,Akola Pradashike office,ParbhaniParbhaniMaharashtra2. Distict Krashi Vikas Officer,Z.P.Parb...
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 01-10-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M/S S. SUMAN
Respondant Advocate M/s. Yadagiri Reddy-R2
First Appeal No. FA/416/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 28/11/2011 in Case No. CC/170/2009 of District Rangareddi)1. MANGALI SHANKARAIAH, S/O LATE M. RAMAIAH, AGED 60 YEARS,R/O H.NO. 4-44, KALLAKAL VILLAGE, TOOPRAN MANDAL, MEDAK DIST............Appellant(s)Versus1. 1. PRAGATHI SEE...
Case Number: 416
|
Date of Filing: 21-03-2012
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. FA/07/1147(Arisen out of Order Dated 26/09/2007 in Case No. 249/2007 of District Ahmednagar)1. Krishidhan seeds Limited 34-C, Bus stand Road ,Jalna............Appellant(s)...
Case Number: 7
|
Date of Filing: 30-10-2007
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 423
|
Date of Filing: 06-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 11-11-2016
The New India Assurance Seeds New India Assurance
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajshree Gudgilla
Respondant Advocate M. M. Ambhore
MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTE REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI.CIRCUIT BENCH AT AURANGABAD.First Appeal No. A/452/2008(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/01/2008 in Case No. 139/2007 of District None)1. Mauli Seeds and Fertilizers,Through its Pro.Gangaadhar S/o. Laxman KarhaleR/o. Sug...
Case Number: 452
|
Date of Filing: 22-04-2008
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. NAVEEN KUMAR CHAUHAN
Respondant Advocate MR. SUDHIR BISLA
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4788 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 05/09/2012 in Appeal No. 1457/2011 of the State Commission Haryana)1. NITYA SEEDSThrough Assitant Manager, Mr Ashit Kumar Choudhary, 1st floor,NCL Enclave NH-7 Medc...
Case Number: 4788
|
Date of Filing: 18-12-2012
|
Date of Upload: 04-09-2013
Court Name: Solapur
Appelant Advocate Deshmukh
Respondant Advocate
District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Solapur.Complaint Case No. CC/10/5631. Dhareppa Kalappa GaddeR/o- Madre tal.South SolapursolapurMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Maharashtra Highbrid seeds co.ltd,2)Vipul Augro seeds,prop.Kashinath Mahadeo Birajdar1)Reshim b...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 23-09-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Dhule
Appelant Advocate V.S.Pathak
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM DHULEComplaint Case No. CC/13/311. Santosh Manga koliAt post Betavad Tal shindkhedaDhuleMaharashtra...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dayvzan Seeds & Pvt. Ltd Gajanan Krupabuilding Kuljitnagar Cidco Aurangabad-431001AurangabadMaharashtra2. Santaji Agro Agen...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 10-04-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Seeds in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Seeds ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Seeds under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.