company-name-logo

Seeds

Latest Judgments

Total 5645 Consumer Court Cases Against Seeds.

NCDRC

DADASAHEB VISHWANATH BAGAL V/S NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD.

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ARUNAV PATNAIK

Respondant Advocate MR. SHIVAJI M. JADHAV, MS. PRITY KUNWAR & MS. SMITAKSHI TALUKDAR

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 130 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 22/02/2012 in Appeal No. 1947/2003 of the State Commission Maharastra)1. NATIONAL SEEDS CORPORATION LTD.BEEJ BHAWAN,PUSA COMPLEX,NEW DELHI- 110012...........Petition...

Case Number: 132

|

Date of Filing: 11-01-2013

|

Date of Upload: 28-05-2014

NCDRC

M/S. SUPER SEEDS PVT. LTD. & 4 ORS. V/S LAXMAN SINGH

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. RAKESH K. MUDGAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4582 OF 2013(Against the Order dated 18/07/2013 in Appeal No. 349/2013 of the State Commission Haryana)1. LAXMAN SINGHSHRI BUDH RAM, S/O SHRI LAL JI R/O VILLAGE BHARAWAS, TEHSIL & DISTRICT : REWARIHARY...

Case Number: 4582

|

Date of Filing: 29-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 28-05-2014

NCDRC

KARNAIL SINGH & ANR. V/S M/S. SATPAUL SEEDS CORPORATION

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PARVEEN KUMAR

Respondant Advocate M/S. PAWAN SHARMA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4808 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1542/2010 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/3862/20131. M/S. SATPAUL SEEDS CORPORATIONThrough ist Proprietor, Shri Trmbaka Kumar Son...

Case Number: 4808

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-05-2014

NCDRC

JASBIR SINGH & ANR. V/S M/S. SATPAUL SEEDS CORPORATION

Seeds  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PARVEEN KUMAR

Respondant Advocate M/S. PAWAN SHARMA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4808 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1542/2010 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/3862/20131. M/S. SATPAUL SEEDS CORPORATIONThrough ist Proprietor, Shri Trmbaka Kumar Son...

Case Number: 4809

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2012

|

Date of Upload: 13-05-2014

NCDRC

KARNAIL SINGH & ANR. V/S M/S. WIPRO SEEDS COMPANY

Seeds   Wipro  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. LALIT BHARDWAJ & MR. M.K. MALHOTRA

Respondant Advocate M/S. PAWAN SHARMA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4808 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1542/2010 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/3862/20131. M/S. SATPAUL SEEDS CORPORATIONThrough ist Proprietor, Shri Trmbaka Kumar Son...

Case Number: 670

|

Date of Filing: 20-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-05-2014

NCDRC

JASBIR SINGH & ANR. V/S M/S. WIPRO HIGHBREED SEEDS

Seeds   Wipro  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. LALIT BHARDWAJ & MR. M.K. MALHOTRA

Respondant Advocate M/S. PAWAN SHARMA & ASSOCIATES

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4808 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 12/10/2012 in Appeal No. 1542/2010 of the State Commission Punjab) WITH IA/3862/20131. M/S. SATPAUL SEEDS CORPORATIONThrough ist Proprietor, Shri Trmbaka Kumar Son...

Case Number: 671

|

Date of Filing: 20-02-2013

|

Date of Upload: 13-05-2014

Andhra Pradesh

Banothu Kishan S/o. Nanu Age 42 Years, R/o. Vanjarapally, Pallariguda (V), R/M Sangem, Warangal Dis V/S 1.Madhuri Agencies, Pesticides & Seeds Station Road, Opp. Sunil Theatre, Warangal Dist. Rep. by its Prop: P. Venkanna.

Seeds  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Gouri Sankara Rao

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/1120/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/08/2013 in Case No. CC/126/2011 of District Warangal)1. 1. Sri Venkateswara Agro Agencies Shop No.24, H.No.8-5-48/2, Opp: Sunil Theatre, Seetharama C...

Case Number: 1134

|

Date of Filing: 22-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

Gugulothu Tejya S/o. Bimla, Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Pallariguda Village, R/M San V/S 1.Madhuri Agencies, Pesticides & Seeds Station Road, Opp. Sunil Theatre, Warangal Dist. Rep. by its Prop: P. Venkanna.

Seeds  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Gouri Sankara Rao

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/1120/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/08/2013 in Case No. CC/126/2011 of District Warangal)1. 1. Sri Venkateswara Agro Agencies Shop No.24, H.No.8-5-48/2, Opp: Sunil Theatre, Seetharama C...

Case Number: 1141

|

Date of Filing: 22-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

Gugulothu Devasingh S/o. Lachu, Aged about 42 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Pallari Guda, Samgem Man V/S 1. Aruna Yeruvula Depot, Pescides & Seeds Station Road, Warangal, Rep. by its Prop. B. sudhir Reddy.

Seeds  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Gouri Sankara Rao

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/1120/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/08/2013 in Case No. CC/126/2011 of District Warangal)1. 1. Sri Venkateswara Agro Agencies Shop No.24, H.No.8-5-48/2, Opp: Sunil Theatre, Seetharama C...

Case Number: 1143

|

Date of Filing: 22-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Andhra Pradesh

Venkudothu Ramka S/o. Narsya, AGed about 42 Years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o. Chitanlapalli Sivathanda, V/S 1.Madhuri Agencies, Pesticides & Seeds Station Road, Opp. Sunil Theatre, Warangal Dist. Rep. by its Prop: P. Venkanna.

Seeds  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. V. Gouri Sankara Rao

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/1120/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/08/2013 in Case No. CC/126/2011 of District Warangal)1. 1. Sri Venkateswara Agro Agencies Shop No.24, H.No.8-5-48/2, Opp: Sunil Theatre, Seetharama C...

Case Number: 1152

|

Date of Filing: 22-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Seeds in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Seeds ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Seeds under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.