Court Name: Dakshina Kannada
Appelant Advocate Suma R.Nayak
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, MANGALOREComplaint Case No. cc/119/2010( Date of Filing : 01 Apr 2010 )1. Nagesh K.NAged 24 years, So Narayana, Residing at Door No.2 353, Akshaya, Marpalli, Karangarapadi, Udupi............Complainant(s)Vers...
Case Number: 119
|
Date of Filing: 01-04-2010
|
Date of Upload: 07-03-2019
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate A SINGH
Respondant Advocate NONE
BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/09/710(Arisen out of Order Dated 15/03/2008 in Case No. 332/07 of District Thane)1. HOLY WRIT INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLPMPOLI VILLAGE NR BARVI DAM BADLAPUR (W) THANEMaharastra..........
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 23-04-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Shyam Padman
Respondant Advocate Anil Kumar.R
First Appeal No. 170/2002(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District ) 1. The Principal,Oriental School of Hotel managementLakkidi,Wayanad PRESENT : ORDER KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAD, THIURVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL 170/2002JUDGMENT DATED...
Case Number: 170
|
Date of Filing: 07-02-2002
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 429 of 2010 1. Pal SinghFather of Vishvash Pal Singh R/o House No. 1536-A Sector-41/B Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. The Principal, Lovely ...
Case Number: 429
|
Date of Filing: 14-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate Sh. Sunil Chawla, Adv.
Respondant Advocate Sh. Rajneesh Garg, Adv.
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,BATHINDA (PUNJAB)DISTRCT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station,Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001consumer case(CC) No. CC/10/298 Manjit SinghMadan Gopal S/o Jani RamNarinder Singh Roop, Advocate, ...........A...
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Junagadh
Appelant Advocate J H MAKADIYA
Respondant Advocate M C ZALA
Case Number: 10
|
Date of Filing: 02-07-2010
|
Date of Upload: 09-11-2019
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 46 of 2010 1. Rajbeer Singh( minor aged 17 Yrs) S/o Sh. ranjit Singh, R/oHouse No. 295 Adarsh Nagar NayaGaon District SAS nagar ( Mohlai) throug...
Case Number: 46
|
Date of Filing: 16-03-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: Bangalore Urban
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
BANGALORE URBAN DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM (Principal)8TH FLOOR, CAUVERY BHAVAN, BWSSB BUILDING, BANGALORE-5600 09.Complaint Case No. CC/09/4871. Ali Morad Kochek Kermanshai No.71, 4th Floor Back unit, Near Sterling Apartments RMV II Stage Lottegollanhalli, BanglaoreKarnataka..........
Case Number: 9
|
Date of Filing: 26-02-2009
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: DF-I
Appelant Advocate D.K.Singal
Respondant Advocate Karan Nehra
CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 79 of 2010 1. Jai Kumar setiaR/o House No. 32 SEctor-17 Panchkula ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Delhi Public Schoolthrough its Principal Sector-40/C ...
Case Number: 79
|
Date of Filing: 03-02-2010
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate MR. AMIT KHATANA
Respondant Advocate
Date of Filing: 17 Sep 2009 NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHIREVISION PETITION NO. No. RP/3509/2009(Against the Order dated 06/01/2009 in Appeal No. 654/2008 of the State Commission Delhi) 1. J.K. BUSINESS SCHOOLThrough Its Chairman . J.K. Building 7th Floo...
Case Number: 3509
|
Date of Filing: 17-09-2009
|
Date of Upload: 03-05-2010
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.