company-name-logo

School

Latest Judgments

Total 3107 Consumer Court Cases Against School.

NCDRC

KAMALA DEVI & ORS. V/S PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT SECONDARY SCHOOL

School   Government  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. ABHISHEK GUPTA & PURUSHOTTAM S.T.

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3856 OF 2010(Against the Order dated 05/02/2010 in Appeal No. 1082/2006 of the State Commission Rajasthan)1. PRINCIPAL, GOVERNMENT SECONDARY SCHOOLLamiya Khatu ShyamjiSikarRajasthan...........Petitione...

Case Number: 3856

|

Date of Filing: 18-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2011

Madhya Pradesh

Head Master, Praymary School Kamahli V/S Chaturdas Bhinjiya

School  

Court Name: Mandla

Appelant Advocate Adv.Dhamendra Dharya

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 27-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2016

Telangana

1.The Correspondent, Century High School V/S Resu Kirshna, S/o. Late Resu Bhadraiah, Age: 39 years,Occu: Plastic Utensils Vendor,

School  

Court Name: Khammam

Appelant Advocate Syed Amzad Pasha

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/10/871. Resu Kirshna, S/o. Late Resu Bhadraiah, Age: 39 years,Occu: Plastic Utensils Vendor, Resu Kirshna, S/o. Late Resu Bhadraiah, Age: 39 years,Occu: Plastic Utensils Vendor, R/o.H.No.4-5-21, Saibaba Temple Road, New Bazar, Mahabubabad, Warangal District....

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 26-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

PUNEET JAIN V/S AMITY BUSINESS SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate VINAY GARG

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 4232 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 11/02/2007 in Appeal No. 247/2006 of the State Commission Delhi)1. AMITY BUSINESS SCHOOL SECTOR 44, NOIDA, U.P. -...........Petitioner(s)Versus1. PUNEET JAINSON OF ...

Case Number: 4232

|

Date of Filing: 19-12-2007

|

Date of Upload: 31-01-2011

Karnataka

M/s.Bangalore School of Business V/S M.S.Neetu Singh, D/o. Mr.Narendra Pal Singh Aged about 23 Years

School  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate H.S.Vivekananda

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/10/18711. M.S.Neetu Singh, D/o. Mr.Narendra Pal Singh Aged about 23 YearsResiding at C/o Nanda kumar, Kumbalagod...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 10-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

M/s.B'lore School of Business V/S Mr.Abhisek Das C/o Mr.Milan Kumar Das Aged about 25 Years

School  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate H.S.Vivekananda

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/10/18721. Mr.Abhisek Das C/o Mr.Milan Kumar Das Aged about 25 YearsR/o at C/o Nanda Kumar, Kumbalagodu Post, Ken...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 10-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

RASHMI S. PRAKASH V/S GEAR INNOVATIVE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. HARIOM YADUVANSHI

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 130 OF 2011(Against the Order dated 06/10/2010 in Appeal No. 3950/2010 of the State Commission Karnataka)1. GEAR INNOVATIVE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOLGear Road, Doddakannelli, Off. Sarjapur Road & Outer Ring...

Case Number: 130

|

Date of Filing: 12-01-2011

|

Date of Upload: 19-01-2011

Madhya Pradesh

KOTHARI B, SCHOOL V/S SURENDA CHOHAN

School  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1068

|

Date of Filing: 23-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 11-04-2016

Madhya Pradesh

JITENDRA RATHORE V/S MP STATE OPEN SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 03-09-2007

|

Date of Upload: 20-01-2017

Madhya Pradesh

MP STATE OPEN SCHOOL V/S JITENDRA RATHORE

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 06-09-2007

|

Date of Upload: 20-01-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.