company-name-logo

School

Latest Judgments

Total 3107 Consumer Court Cases Against School.

Chandigarh

Vivek High School V/S Rajiv Sahney

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Mr. Neeraj Sobti, Adv. for appellant

Respondant Advocate Sh. Inderjit Kaushal, Adv. for OP

The State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionUnion Territory,Chandigarh ,Plot No 5-B, Sector No 19B,Madhya Marg, Chandigarh-160 019FIRST APPEAL NO. 465 of 2010 1. Rajiv SahneyProprietor M/s Global Engineers and Associates, #1089, Sector 37-B, Chandigarh ...........Appellant(s)...

Case Number: 465

|

Date of Filing: 24-12-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Karnataka

Gear Innovative Intl. School V/S Rashmi S. Prakash

School  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Execution Application No. EA/10/1551. Rashmi S. PrakashA 204 Mantri Classic 1st Main,8th Cross S.T Bed Layout Koramangala, 4th Block B...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 28-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Head Master, Praymary School Surpati V/S Amarulal

School  

Court Name: Mandla

Appelant Advocate Adv.G.R.Gayak

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 04-02-2011

|

Date of Upload: 08-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Principal Semeritan English Medium School V/S Yogendra Ujjeniya

School  

Court Name: Hoshangabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 235

|

Date of Filing: 20-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2016

Andhra Pradesh

MRS.SHAIK KURSHEEDA BEGUM W/O SHAIK AHAMMAD VALLI DIRECTOR OF VISAKKA VIDYA VIHAR SCHOOL V/S MR.P.SURESH KUMAR

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate MR.N.SURYA KUMARI

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. FA/575/09(Arisen out of Order Dated null in Case No. of District Visakhapatnam-I)1. MR.P.SURESH KUMAR R/O ADARSHNAGAR, OLD DAIRY FARM, VISAKHAPATNAM. BEFORE:HONABLE MR. JUSTICE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE D. APPA RAO PRESIDENTHONABLE MRS. M.SHREESHA Member PRESENT: ORDE...

Case Number: 575

|

Date of Filing: 25-06-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Uttar Pradesh

Smt Premwati V/S Principal Bhawani Balika Higher Secondary School

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate Rakesh Kumar Gupta

Respondant Advocate -

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Revision Petition No. R/1998/07( Date of Filing : 09 Feb 1998 )(Arisen out of Order Dated in Case No. of District State Commission)1. Principal Bhawani Balika Higher...

Case Number: 1998

|

Date of Filing: 09-02-1998

|

Date of Upload: 10-08-2022

Madhya Pradesh

Head Master, Naveen Midle School V/S Chatur Ahirwal S/o Shri Puran Ahirwal

School  

Court Name: Damoh

Appelant Advocate Sh Abdul Kareem

Respondant Advocate Sh Devi Singh Rajput / Ku. Aparna Nakda

Case Number: 58

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2011

|

Date of Upload: 17-03-2016

Madhya Pradesh

DEEN SCHOOL OF DENTAL SCIENCE AND HOSPITAL V/S DR.VIBHA

Hospital   School   Dental  

Court Name: Jabalpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 17-11-2009

|

Date of Upload: 22-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

Principal Saint Patrik School V/S Veerendra Singh Pawar

School  

Court Name: Hoshangabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 319

|

Date of Filing: 15-12-2008

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

M P MADHYA KSHETRA VIDYUT VITRAN CO LTD V/S SHEEL NIKETAN SCHOOL

Vidyut   School  

Court Name: Bhopal

Appelant Advocate SEWAKRAM SOBHANI ADV

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 20-11-2008

|

Date of Upload: 24-02-2016

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.