company-name-logo

School

Latest Judgments

Total 3107 Consumer Court Cases Against School.

Madhya Pradesh

ALESCO BUSINESS SCHOOL V/S GORAV

School  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 472

|

Date of Filing: 26-04-2011

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2016

Telangana

Case Number: 102

|

Date of Filing: 01-08-2011

|

Date of Upload: 13-02-2016

Madhya Pradesh

PRINCIPAL GOVERNEMENT HIGER SECONDARY SCHOOL V/S RAM NIRANJAN MISHRA

School  

Court Name: Rewa

Appelant Advocate SHRI VIDHADHAR SHRAMA

Respondant Advocate SHRI ASHOK AWASTHI

Case Number: 177

|

Date of Filing: 30-09-2009

|

Date of Upload: 28-01-2017

Kerala

Hamsa P V/S The Principal,Good Shepherd Modern English School

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S Reghukumar

Respondant Advocate

Kerala State Consumer Disputes Redressal CommissionVazhuthacaud,ThiruvananthapuramFirst Appeal No. A/11/746(Arisen out of Order Dated 14/09/2011 in Case No. CC/11/161 of District Malappuram)1. The Principal,Good Shepherd Modern English SchoolPalunda,Chungathara Niulambur,Malappur...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 03-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

THE PRESIDENT, PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION, KALLIL GOVT. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL V/S FATHIMA T.M

School  

Court Name: Ernakulam

Appelant Advocate T.J LAKSHMANAN

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMERNAKULAMComplaint Case No. CC/12/521. FATHIMA T.MTHUTHUPPILLY HOUSE, CHELEKULAM, VENGOLA P.O, 683 554...........Complainant(s)Versus1. THE PRESIDENT, PARENT TEACHER ASSOCIATION, KALLIL GOVT. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOLMETHALA P.O, ERNAKULA...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 24-01-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

KU. SANDHYA MER V/S PRINCIPLE BAL VIDHYA BIHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 11-08-2009

|

Date of Upload: 04-11-2015

Punjab

The Principal,Carmel convent school V/S Varinder singh

School  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTT.CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM,Govt.House No.16-D,Civil Station, Near SSP Residence,BATHINDA-151001(PUNJAB) Execution Application No. EA/12/231. Varinder singhson of Kuldeep singh r/o st.no.29 SAS Nagar,bathinda...........Appellant(s)Versus1. The Principal,Carmel convent...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 03-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

Head Master Aronoday Public School & Others V/S Padeep Kumar Goutam S/O Narottam Prashad Goutam

School  

Court Name: Satna

Appelant Advocate S.P.Viswkarma

Respondant Advocate NA

Case Number: 6

|

Date of Filing: 20-12-2006

|

Date of Upload: 26-02-2016

Karnataka

The Principal St. george High School V/S Antony Vijay

School  

Court Name: Bangalore 4th Additional

Appelant Advocate Inperson

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE 4TH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, BANGALORE URBANNo.8, 7th Floor, Shakara Bhavan,Cunninghum, Bangalore:-560052Complaint Case No. CC/11/21261. Antony Vijay#122, Christ Castle, Christ Layout, Kaverinagar, Voddarpalya, Horamavu Post, Bangalore -56...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 24-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

NCDRC

PREMASH PATHAK MINOR V/S DIRECTOR & PRINCIPAL ALPHA SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. M.Z. CHAUDHARY

Respondant Advocate -

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3570 OF 2007(Against the Order dated 09/10/2007 in Appeal No. 710/2007 of the State Commission Madhya Pradesh)1. DIRECTOR & PRINCIPAL ALPHA SCHOOL PLACE DALVI NAGAR COLONY, GUNA, DISTT. GUNA, M.P.......

Case Number: 3570

|

Date of Filing: 23-10-2007

|

Date of Upload: 24-05-2012

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.