company-name-logo

School

Latest Judgments

Total 3107 Consumer Court Cases Against School.

Chandigarh

Harness Overseas Marketing Pvt. Ltd, V/S Vivek High School

School  

Court Name: DF-II

Appelant Advocate Inderjit Kaushal

Respondant Advocate

CHANDIGARH DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-IIPlot No. 5-B, Sector 19-B, Madhya marg, Chandigarh - 160019CONSUMER CASE NO. 53 of 2011 1. Vivek High Schoolthrough its Chairman H.s. Mamik, Sector 38/B, Chandigarh. ...........Appellant(s)Vs.1. Harness Overseas Marketing Pv...

Case Number: 53

|

Date of Filing: 02-02-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Gujarat

V J Modi School V/S Prafulchandra Kotecha

School  

Court Name: Rajkot Addl

Appelant Advocate -

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 2012

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 19-02-2020

Madhya Pradesh

HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL V/S ARJUN

School  

Court Name: Mandsaur

Appelant Advocate RK GUPTA

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 74

|

Date of Filing: 02-05-2011

|

Date of Upload: 10-05-2016

Gujarat

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 20-11-2012

|

Date of Upload: 01-09-2020

Kerala

Suni Kumar V/S Eminance Public School

School  

Court Name: Pathanamthitta

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/12/681. Eminance Public School...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Suni Kumar............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HONORABLE Jacob Stephen PRESIDENTHONABLE MR. N.PremKumar MemberHONABLE MRS. K.P.Padmasree MEMBER PRESENT: ORDERIN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 22-03-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

The Kasaragod Taluk Unaided School Teachers Welfare Co-op Society Ltd V/S Nagaveni

School   Society  

Court Name: Kasaragod

Appelant Advocate Thomas D'Souza, Kasaragod

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/11/3221. NagaveniW/o.Seetharama Shetty, Amethody House,Mugu.PoKasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Kasaragod Taluk Unaided School Teachers Welfare Co-op Society LtdWelfare Co-op. Society Ltd, Apsara complex, Perla Road, Seethmgoli, Rep. By it...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 25-11-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Jharkhand

Principle MKDAV School and others V/S Sayed Farhan Ahmad

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s S. Saurabh, R. Ranjan and S. Garapati

Respondant Advocate M/s S.K. Srivastava and Ratnakar Bhengra

Case Number: 231

|

Date of Filing: 10-08-2010

|

Date of Upload: 13-10-2022

NCDRC

PRINCIPAL ARYA PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL ANR. V/S RAVI GARG

School  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PREETWINDER SINGH DHALIWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3377 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1204/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. RAVI GARGS/o Prem Nath R/o Ward No-13 Near Post Office, BaretaMansaPunjab...........Petitioner(...

Case Number: 3377

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-10-2012

NCDRC

PRINCIPAL ARYA PUBLIC HIGH SCHOOL & ANR. V/S HARJIWAN KUMAR

School  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PREETWINDER SINGH DHALIWAL

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI REVISION PETITION NO. 3378 OF 2012(Against the Order dated 27/04/2012 in Appeal No. 1205/2011 of the State Commission Punjab)1. HARJIWAN KUMARR/o House No.59, Mulajim Colony, Budhlada Road, BaretaMansaPunjab...........Petit...

Case Number: 3378

|

Date of Filing: 07-09-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-10-2012

Maharashtra

MAHAPRAGYA PUBLIC SCHOOL V/S MAYUR V ADANI

School   Adani  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate AR MR PRAKASH SHETH

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE HON'BLE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRA, MUMBAIFirst Appeal No. A/12/549(Arisen out of Order Dated 07/03/2012 in Case No. 134/2010 of District DCF, South Mumbai)1. MAYUR V ADANI200 NEW AMRUTWADI 3 RD FLOOR V P ROAD PRATHNA SAMAJ MUMBAI - 40000...

Case Number: 12

|

Date of Filing: 12-04-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.