company-name-logo

School

Latest Judgments

Total 3107 Consumer Court Cases Against School.

Andhra Pradesh

1. Madugula Ramu S/o. Narayana Murthy, Aged 44 Y ears, Working as a School Assistant, Z.P.H. School, V/S 1.The Andhra Pradesh Rajiv Swagruha Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Plot No. A6, 1st Floor Sahabhavana Town Ship Nagole- Bandla Guda, Hyderabad.

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate M/s. A. Naveen Kumar

Respondant Advocate Madugula Ramu- R1(S)

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/792/2013(Arisen out of Order Dated 09/05/2013 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/45/2013 of District Srikakulam)1. 1.The Andhra Pradesh Rajiv Swagruha Corporation Ltd., Rep. by its Managing...

Case Number: 792

|

Date of Filing: 15-07-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

West Bengal

Assistant Headmaster / Headmaster, Jodhpur Park Boy's School V/S Dipak Kumar Das

School  

Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Kolkata - I (North)8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site - confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/14/86( Date of Filing : 05 Feb 2014 )1. Dipak Kumar DasVill. & P.O. Arampur, PS Gosaba, 24 Pgs(S)-743370............Comp...

Case Number: 14

|

Date of Filing: 05-02-2014

|

Date of Upload: 19-04-2023

Andhra Pradesh

1. Southern Power Distribution Company of AP Limited, Divisional Engineer, Near Rythu Bazar, Guntur. V/S Potturi Tulasidas, S/o. Venkata Koteswara Rao, R/o. D.No. 26-5, High School Road, Gandhipet, Chilakaluripet.

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate P.Tulasidas (P.I.P)

Respondant Advocate Mr. P. Vinod Kumar for R2 to R3

BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABADFirst Appeal No. FA/632/2012(Arisen out of Order Dated 04/07/2012 in Case No. CC/98/2012 of District Guntur)1. Potturi Tulasidas, S/o. Venkata Koteswara Rao, R/o. D.No. 26-5, High School Road, Gandhipet, Chil...

Case Number: 632

|

Date of Filing: 09-08-2012

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

RISING PUBLIC SCHOOL V/S KAVINDRA SINGH SENGAR

School  

Court Name: Gwalior

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 387

|

Date of Filing: 16-08-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-03-2016

Punjab

The Principal,Radcliff school V/S Manoj Kumar

School  

Court Name: Bhatinda

Appelant Advocate Rajesh Bansal

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/13/4501. Manoj Kumarsonof Darshan singh r/o v. Kot GurBathinda2. Deepak kumar son of Manohar lalr/o Sangat Mandi...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Principal,Radcliff school430-P,Shant nagar, Near Model town,PhaseII,Bathinda2. Radcliff school287-288,Badal ...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 11-10-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Uttar Pradesh

MODI SCHOOL V/S ARVIND KUMAR

School  

Court Name: Muzaffarnagar

Appelant Advocate -

Respondant Advocate -

Case Number: 88

|

Date of Filing: 20-04-2013

|

Date of Upload: 16-07-2022

Maharashtra

The School Of Fashion Technology, Through Its Chairman& Managing Commitee. V/S Ku.Aboli D/o. Ashok Wankhade

Fashion   School  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate Adv. P.S. Verma.

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPURNew Administrative Building5 th Floor, Civil Lines.Nagpur-440 0010712-2548522Complaint Case No. CC/13/8071. Ku.Aboli D/o. Ashok WankhadeR/o G-6, Phanthion, Ashraya Apartment, Near Reliance Fresh, Manish Nagar,Nagpur.NagpurMaharash...

Case Number: 13

|

Date of Filing: 11-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

GENIUS PREPARATORY SCHOOL V/S ANAND GUPTA

School  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 1215

|

Date of Filing: 17-12-2013

|

Date of Upload: 18-05-2016

Karnataka

Case Number: 1735

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2023

Karnataka

Case Number: 1736

|

Date of Filing: 26-11-2013

|

Date of Upload: 01-07-2023

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.