School
Latest Judgments
Total 3087 Consumer Court Cases Against School.
Vinoda , V/S Hirekerur Taluk Primary School Shikshaka-Shikshakiyara Co. Operative Society Limited,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M.S. Rudraiah
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1737
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2023
Bheemanagowda Shivaputrappa Shirigowdru V/S Hirekerur Taluk Primary School Shikshaka-Shikshakiyara Co. Operative Society Limited,
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M.S. Rudraiah
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 1738
|
Date of Filing: 26-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 01-07-2023
Poonam Roshan lala V/S Modern School International Principal Shri Shirish Joshi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajnish Vyas
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/11/380(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/03/2011 in Case No. cc/09/781 of District None)1. Modern School International...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Abdul Majid Alim Sheikh V/S Modern School International Principal Shri Shirish Joshi
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Rajnish Vyas
Respondant Advocate
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MAHARASHTRACIRCUIT BENCH AT NAGPUR5 TH FLOOR, ADMINISTRATIVE BUILDING NO. 1CIVIL LINES, NAGPUR-440 001First Appeal No. A/11/381(Arisen out of Order Dated 05/03/2011 in Case No. cc/09/781 of District None)1. Modern School International...
Case Number: 11
|
Date of Filing: 07-09-2011
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
MSD Sr.Sec Public school V/S Sohan singh
Court Name: Bhatinda
Appelant Advocate s.S.Sandhu
Respondant Advocate
Complaint Case No. CC/13/2021. Sohan singhsonof Jugraj singh r/o village Laleana tehsil talwandi saboBathinda...........Complainant(s)Versus1. MSD Sr.Sec Public schoolRaman Mandi theough its President.2. PresidentMSD Sr.Secondary school Public school Raman Mandi Bathinda............
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 14-05-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
GURU HARKISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & 4 ORS., V/S Shri VARINDER SINGH BHATIA,
Court Name: NCDRC
Appelant Advocate M/s MANISH KUMAR & ASSOCIATES,
Respondant Advocate
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 438 OF 2013 WITH IA/8040/20131. Shri VARINDER SINGH BHATIA,S/o Shri Amrik Singh Bhatia, 312, SFS Flats, Mukerji Nagar,DELHI - 110009............Complainant(s)Versus1. GURU HARKISHAN PUBLIC SCHOOL & 4 ORS....
Case Number: 438
|
Date of Filing: 20-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 17-01-2014
Principal, Desun School of Nursing V/S AMRITA MONDAL
Court Name: Howrah
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM HOWRAH20, Round Tank Lane, Howrah – 1.(033) 2638-0892; 0512 E-Mail:- confo-hw-wb@nic.in Fax: - (033) 2638-0892Complaint Case No. CC/13/4161. AMRITA MONDALD/O Sri Gobinda Mondal, Vill & P.O. Naul, P.S. Shyampur, Dist Howrah Pin - 711 31...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 03-12-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
M.D.PATEL MOTORS V/S DAIMAND PUBLIC SCHOOL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 28-03-2013
|
Date of Upload: 21-09-2016
PRINCIPAL-REDCLIFFE SCHOOL V/S SIDDHARTA MULLICK
Court Name: Kolkata-II(Central)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
cause list8B,Nelie Sengupta Sarani,7th Floor,Kolkata-700087.Complaint Case No. CC/208/2013 1. SIDDHARTA MULLICK279/B,RABINDRA SARANI,KOLKATA-700006. ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. PRINCIPAL-REDCLIFFE SCHOOL25,DR. ASUTOSH SHASTRI ROAD,P.S-BELIAGHATA,KOLKATA-700010. ...........Re...
Case Number: 208
|
Date of Filing: 16-07-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Case Number: 1211
|
Date of Filing: 13-02-2013
|
Date of Upload: 18-05-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.