School
Latest Judgments
Total 3088 Consumer Court Cases Against School.
H.M., Govt. Primary School Tharkheda V/S Lakhan S/O Matru ram Jatav
Court Name: Shivpuri
Appelant Advocate Sanker Lal Govil
Respondant Advocate Madan Bhihari Shrivastava
Case Number: 241
|
Date of Filing: 13-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 31-05-2016
Shivjyoti Convent Senior Secondary School V/S Umesh kumar garg
Court Name: Kota
Appelant Advocate Vijay singhal
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2016
|
Date of Upload: 07-04-2016
Prop., Royal Automobile Pvt. Ltd. Authorized Dealer Mahindra & Mahindra Ltd. V/S Girraj Sharma S/O Shri Premnarayan Sharma, Director, Geeta Public School
Mahindra & Mahindra School Automobile
Court Name: Shivpuri
Appelant Advocate Ajay Jain
Respondant Advocate Deepak Sharma
Case Number: 390
|
Date of Filing: 21-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 05-05-2016
Neemawat Public School V/S Daronesh Sharma
Court Name: Sikar
Appelant Advocate Narender Kumar Varma
Respondant Advocate Maynak Garg
Case Number: 4
|
Date of Filing: 07-01-2015
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2016
Tata Interactive Systyem, A division of Tata Industries V/S Pankaj Shrivastava Managing Director of Ved International School
Court Name: Ghazipur
Appelant Advocate Shri Kameshwer Nath Verma & Shri Shushil Kumar Verma
Respondant Advocate Shri Rudra Kumar Rai
Case Number: 91
|
Date of Filing: 13-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 04-04-2016
Edusmart Services V/S Anglo Vedic Middle School
Court Name: Una
Appelant Advocate Sh. Ashish Sachdeva
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM UNADISTRICT UNA (HP).Complaint Case No. CC/36/20161. Anglo Vedic Middle SchoolVPO saloh, Tehsil & District Una (HP) 174303, through its Principal...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Edusmart Services Private Limited, 1-74, Mahipa...
Case Number: 36
|
Date of Filing: 17-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 01-04-2016
ABDUL KAREEM V/S EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR IT SCHOOL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M NIZARUDEEN
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO. 232/15JUDGMENT DATED:31.03.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERExecutive Director,IT @ School Project, Poojappura P.O, Thiruvananthapuram.: APP...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 08-04-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
SHABEEB M V/S DISTICT OFFICE IT SCHOOL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M NIZARUDHEEN
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO. 399/15JUDGMENT DATED:31.03.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERDistrict Office,IT @ School , : APPELLANTMalappuram, PIN-676 505.(By Adv: Sri....
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
ABDUL BASHEER KOORIMANNIL V/S CO ORDINATOR IT SCHOOL THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M NIZARUDHEEN
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO. 400/15JUDGMENT DATED:31.03.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERDistrict Office,IT @ School , Malappuram, PIN-676 505. : APPELLANT(By Adv: Sri. ...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
FAISAL BABU K V/S DISTRICT OFFICE IT SCHOOL
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate M NIZARUDHEEN
Respondant Advocate
KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAMAPPEAL NO. 401/15JUDGMENT DATED:31.03.2016PRESENT : JUSTICE SHRI. P.Q. BARKATHALI : PRESIDENTSHRI.V.V. JOSE : MEMBERDistrict Office,IT @ School Project, : APPELLANTMalappuram,Malappuram-676 505.(...
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 18-05-2015
|
Date of Upload: 28-04-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.