School
Latest Judgments
Total 3088 Consumer Court Cases Against School.
Principal Saint Charles H.S. School Rasulia Hoshangabad V/S Himanshu
Court Name: Hoshangabad
Appelant Advocate Rajesh Agrawal
Respondant Advocate Exparty
Case Number: 15
|
Date of Filing: 20-11-2015
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2016
CENTRAL GOVT. HEALTH SCHOOL V/S CHARANJEET SINGH RAJPUT
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
IN THE STATE COMMISSION: Delhi(Constituted under section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986)Date of Decision: 08.07.2016First Appeal No. 663/2013 In the Matter of: Charanjit Singh Rajput, S/o Late Sh. H.R. Rajput, 10-D, Pocket-D, Gangotri Enclave, Alaknanda, New Delhi. Also a...
Case Number: 663
|
Date of Filing: 05-06-2013
|
Date of Upload: 14-07-2016
M/s Orchids the International School V/S Dr. Kishore Babu Kota,
Court Name: Bangalore 3rd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. cc/2674/20131. Dr. Kishore Babu Kota,S/o Veera Raghavaiah Kota, Aged about 34 Year. R/at Raghuram Residency Flat c -15, Behind Ramaiah Choultry, Gokula , Bangalore-54...........Complainant(s)Versus1. M/s Orchids the International SchoolBehind P ...
Case Number: 2674
|
Date of Filing: 30-11-2013
|
Date of Upload: 06-08-2016
Dr Virendra Swaroop Publuic School V/S Rajendra Kumar Gupta
Court Name: StateCommission
Appelant Advocate Alok Sinha
Respondant Advocate R K Gupta M Effendi
STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UPC-1 Vikrant Khand 1 (Near Shaheed Path), Gomti Nagar Lucknow-226010Complaint Case No. C/2009/291. Rajendra Kumar Gupta...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Dr Virendra Swaroop Publuic School............Opp.Party(s) BEFORE:HON'BLE MR. Ud...
Case Number: 2009
|
Date of Filing: 28-05-2009
|
Date of Upload: 03-06-2016
SMT. MADHAVI BEN VORA, DIRECTOR U.L.J.K. SECURITES PVT.LTD. 7TH FLOOR STOCK EXCHANGE, DALAL STREET F V/S DILIP MULJI BHAI SONI S/O LT. MULJI BHAI SONI, PUSHPAK APARTMENT D-3 THIRD FLOOR, GOVT. NEAR SCHOOL CHOTAPARA RAIPUR C.G.
Court Name: Raipur
Appelant Advocate SELF
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 26-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2016
SMT. MADHWI BEN WORA , MUMBAI , MAHARASTRA V/S SMT . NAINA D. SONY , H/O SHRI DILIP SONY , PUSHPAK APARTMENT FLAIT NO. D.-3 OPP. GOVRMENT SCHOOL CHOTA PARA , RAIPUR C.G.
Court Name: Raipur
Appelant Advocate DILIP SONY
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 12
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2012
|
Date of Upload: 17-05-2016
Tata Classedge V/S M/s Stalwart International School
Court Name: Bangalore 2nd Additional
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 350
|
Date of Filing: 01-03-2016
|
Date of Upload: 20-05-2016
M/S. Hope Hall Foundation School V/S Rajendra Singh Bisht
Court Name: New Delhi
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI (DISTT. NEW DELHI),‘M’ BLOCK, 1STFLOOR, VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P.ESTATE, NEW DELHI-110001. Case No.C.C./631/2012 Dated: In the matter of:RAJENDRA SINGH BISHT,S/o Sh. Bhagwan Singh,Residing at ...
Case Number: 631
|
Date of Filing: 06-07-2012
|
Date of Upload: 13-05-2016
Corporate Business School V/S Priyanka Katiyar
Court Name: Gautam Buddha Nagar
Appelant Advocate Self
Respondant Advocate None
FINAL ORDERDISTRICT CONSUMER FORUMGAUTAM BUDDH NAGAR SURAJPUR , GREATER NOIDA (U.P.)COURT 1Complaint Case No. CC/434/2012( Date of Filing : 29 Nov 2012 )1. Priyanka KatiyarGautam Buddh Nagar...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Corporate Business SchoolGautam Buddh Nagar............O...
Case Number: 434
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2012
|
Date of Upload: 23-06-2021
M/s. Reliance General Insurance Company Limited & Others V/S M/s. Modern B.P.Public School
Reliance Reliance General Insurance School General Insurance
Court Name: Faridabad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 5
|
Date of Filing: 04-01-2013
|
Date of Upload: 26-05-2016
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.