company-name-logo

School

Latest Judgments

Total 3088 Consumer Court Cases Against School.

Uttar Pradesh

Study Well Public School V/S Kaushlendra Singh

School  

Court Name: Sitapur

Appelant Advocate Jai Kumar Singh

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 106

|

Date of Filing: 30-08-2016

|

Date of Upload: 09-11-2017

Delhi

KAPIL KANT PANCHAL V/S RAI BUSINESS SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/11/520(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/08/2011 in Case No. 376/08 of District South II)1. RAI BUSINESS SCHOOLA-41MCIE MATHURA ROAD NEW DELHI-44...........Appellant(s)Versu...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2016

Delhi

VINOD CHAUHAN V/S RAI BUSINESS SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/11/521(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/08/2011 in Case No. 380/08 of District South II)1. RAI BUSINESS SCHOOLA-41 MCIE MATHURA ROAD NEW DELHI-44...........Appellant(s)Vers...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2016

Delhi

MANOHAR LAL V/S RAI BUSINESS SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/11/522(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/08/2011 in Case No. 378/08 of District South II)1. RAI BUSINESS SCHOOLA-41 MCIE MATHURA ROAD NEW DELHI-44...........Appellant(s)Vers...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2016

Delhi

JAGJIT CHAUHAN V/S RAI BUSINESS SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/11/523(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/08/2011 in Case No. 379/08 of District South II)1. RAI BUSINESS SCHOOLA-41 MCIE MATHURA ROAD, ND-44...........Appellant(s)Versus1. J...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2016

Delhi

ZAHOOR AHMED DAR V/S RAI BUSINESS SCHOOL

School  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

IN THE STATE COMMISSION DELHIConstituted under Section 9 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986First Appeal No. A/11/524(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/08/2011 in Case No. 377/08 of District South II)1. RAI BUSINESS SCHOOLA-41, M.C.I.E., MATHURA ROAD NEW DELH-...........Appellant(s)V...

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 29-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 15-10-2016

Karnataka

Indian Public School V/S Sri.Rajesh Babu P.B,

School  

Court Name: Bangalore 1st & Rural Additional

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

BEFORE THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM SESHADRIPURAM BANGALORE - 20PRESENT SRI.SYED ANSER KHALEEM, B.SC., B.ED., LL.B., PRESIDENTSRI.H.JANARDHAN, B.A.L., LL.B., MEMBERComplaint Case No. CC/1525/20141. Sri.Rajesh Babu P.B,18, 2nd Floor, No.3rd Cross, 3r...

Case Number: 1525

|

Date of Filing: 30-08-2014

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2016

Rajasthan

Principle, Central Academy School V/S Narendra sharma

School  

Court Name: Kota

Appelant Advocate Aktar Khan

Respondant Advocate Satish pachori

Case Number: 326

|

Date of Filing: 31-10-2012

|

Date of Upload: 04-10-2016

Haryana

Punjab National Bank V/S Ganpati Convent School

Punjab National Bank   Punjab National Bank   School  

Court Name: Yamunanagar

Appelant Advocate Harvinder Aneja

Respondant Advocate

Ganpati Convent School vs. PNBCC No. 320 of 2016.Present: Sh. Harvinder Aneja, Advocate, counsel for complainant. Today the case was fixed for consideration on the point of admission. Heard. After hearing the counsel for the complainant and going through the contents of the compl...

Case Number: 320

|

Date of Filing: 02-09-2016

|

Date of Upload: 03-10-2016

Madhya Pradesh

KIDS COLLEGE SCHOOL V/S RAVI RAJ AGRAWAL S/O BAL KRISHNA AGRAWAL

School  

Court Name: Indore

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 506

|

Date of Filing: 29-05-2015

|

Date of Upload: 28-07-2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.