company-name-logo

School

Latest Judgments

Total 3110 Consumer Court Cases Against School.

Gujarat

UNITED WORLD SCHOOL OF BUSINESS V/S DILIPKUMAR

School  

Court Name: Ahmedabad Rural

Appelant Advocate S.G.SHAH

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 12-02-2019

|

Date of Upload: 27-01-2020

NCDRC

SHIVAM MALHOTRA V/S MANAGING DIRECTOR, OXL SCHOOL OF MULTIMEDIA & ANR.

School  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. PANKAJ CHANDGOTHIA, ANANT AGARWAL, SWETA RANI & RITIKA KHANNA

Respondant Advocate

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 261 OF 2012 1. MANU SOLANKI & 8 ORS.79, Pocket 7, Sector 22, RohiniNew Delhi - 1100862. R. Pawan Dass1711 Vishnu Garden, JGD. Distt. Yamuna Nagar, Haryana3. Naveen SangwanH No-275, Sec-9A, Distt. GurgaonGu...

Case Number: 3383

|

Date of Filing: 17-12-2018

|

Date of Upload: 21-01-2020

NCDRC

HARMEET SINGH & 2 ORS. V/S GYAN VIHAR SCHOOL ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY

School  

Court Name: NCDRC

Appelant Advocate MR. MADAV MITRA, MR. RAVI CHAWLA, MR. SHOVIT & MR. VIVEK LUTHRA

Respondant Advocate MR.PAWAN KUMAR RAY

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSIONNEW DELHI CONSUMER CASE NO. 261 OF 2012 1. MANU SOLANKI & 8 ORS.79, Pocket 7, Sector 22, RohiniNew Delhi - 1100862. R. Pawan Dass1711 Vishnu Garden, JGD. Distt. Yamuna Nagar, Haryana3. Naveen SangwanH No-275, Sec-9A, Distt. GurgaonGu...

Case Number: 2047

|

Date of Filing: 20-05-2013

|

Date of Upload: 21-01-2020

Delhi

M/S. MGRM Net Ltd. V/S ITL Public School

School  

Court Name: New Delhi

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM-VI(DISTRICT NEW DELHI, M-BLOCK, 1ST FLOOR,VIKAS BHAWAN, I.P. ESTATE. NEW DELHI-1100001.CC.No.800/2011ITL Public School,Sec.9, Dwarka,New Delhi-110077.….ComplainantVs.M/s MGRM Net Ltd.,C-6/5, Safdarjung Development Area,New Delhi-110016.......

Case Number: 800

|

Date of Filing: 28-07-2011

|

Date of Upload: 27-01-2020

Orissa

(1) Secretary, School and Mass Education, At. Secreteriate Building, Bhubaneswar, Po/Ps. Bhubaneswar V/S Akash Panda

School  

Court Name: Bargarh

Appelant Advocate Jayashree Mohapatra with other Advocates

Respondant Advocate

Heading1Heading2Complaint Case No. CC/40/2019( Date of Filing : 31 May 2019 )1. Akash PandaBaibaswata Panda resident of College Chowk, Barpali, Po/Ps. Barpali, Dist. Bargarh,BargarhOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. (1) Secretary, School and Mass Education, At. Secreteriate ...

Case Number: 40

|

Date of Filing: 31-05-2019

|

Date of Upload: 15-02-2020

Telangana

Abhyasa Residential Public School V/S Yenugu Vedanth Reddy

School  

Court Name: Hyderabad

Appelant Advocate M.Ravinder Reddy

Respondant Advocate Manu

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM I HYDERABAD(9th Floor, Chandravihar Complex, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad 500 001)Complaint Case No. CC/414/2017( Date of Filing : 11 Sep 2017 )1. Yenugu Vedanth ReddyH.No. 17.1.383 of A of 43 of 59, Vinay Nagar colony, Said...

Case Number: 414

|

Date of Filing: 11-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 03-03-2020

Rajasthan

BHARAT SCHOOL OF NURSING V/S DILIP DEVASI

School  

Court Name: Jodhpur-II

Appelant Advocate M S RATHORE

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 94

|

Date of Filing: 01-09-2017

|

Date of Upload: 13-01-2020

West Bengal

President School Management Committee of USHA MARTIN School V/S Subrata Malakar

School  

Court Name: Nadia

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMNADIA170,DON BOSCO ROAD, AUSTIN MEMORIAL BUILDING.NADIA, KRISHNAGARComplaint Case No. CC/79/2018( Date of Filing : 30 May 2018 )1. Subrata MalakarS/o Late Sukhendra Nath Malakar 46/A, Sashibabu Rd., Jorapukur, Sahid Nagar P.O. Kanchrapara...

Case Number: 79

|

Date of Filing: 30-05-2018

|

Date of Upload: 14-01-2020

Jharkhand

The Secretary Bihar School Examination Board Patna, Bihar. V/S Rash Bihari Dubey

School  

Court Name: Deoghar

Appelant Advocate Amrendra Kr. Rao

Respondant Advocate Nilanjan Ganguli

Case Number: 2

|

Date of Filing: 15-01-2016

|

Date of Upload: 14-01-2020

Maharashtra

Tree House High School V/S Burgula Vijaya Kumar Benarji

School  

Court Name: Pune

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 19

|

Date of Filing: 16-04-2019

|

Date of Upload: 13-01-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against School in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against School ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against School under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.