Samsung
Latest Judgments
Total 5090 Consumer Court Cases Against Samsung.
The Manager/Proprietor, Samsung Authorised Service Center, Symphony Communications, Vypana Complex, V/S Jino George, S/o George, Eruppakkottil House,Moolankavu P O,
Court Name: Wayanad
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION ,KALPETTAWAYANAD-673122PHONE 04936-202755Complaint Case No. CC/154/20141. Jino George, S/o George, Eruppakkottil House,Moolankavu P O, Sulthan BatheryWayanadKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. The Manager/Proprietor, Samsung Auth...
Case Number: 154
|
Date of Filing: 30-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Samsung India Electronic Pvt.Ltd-Samsung Service Station- B M Trading Pvt.ltd- Mohanbhai Thakor V/S Kiranbhai Bharatbhai parmar
Court Name: Kachchh
Appelant Advocate S J Gor
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 29-11-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-04-2015
Samsung India Electronic Pvt. Ltd. V/S Pratim Adhikari
Court Name: Kolkata-I(North)
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Unit-1, Kolkata8B, Nelie Sengupta Sarani, 4th Floor, Kolkata-700087.Web-site : confonet.nic.inComplaint Case No. CC/13/5361. Pratim Adhikari10/1/1, Ramkinu Sarkar Lane, Howrah-711101.HowrahWB...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Samsung India Electr...
Case Number: 13
|
Date of Filing: 29-08-2013
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Samsung Service Centre,Hospet V/S Sri.Vidhyadhar s/o R.S.Megharaj
Court Name: Koppal
Appelant Advocate Sri.M.A.Umachagi,Adv
Respondant Advocate
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMOLD CIVIL COURT BUILDING, JAWAHAR ROAD, KOPPALComplaint Case No. CC/14/411. Sri.Vidhyadhar s/o R.S.MegharajSri.Vidhyadhar s/o R.S.Megharaj,age:36,occ:Lecturer,r/o Bhagyanagar,tq:dist:koppalKoppalKaranataka...........Complainant...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 20-08-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
Samsung India pvt. Ltd. and others V/S Rahul Soni
Court Name: Chittaurgarh
Appelant Advocate Himself
Respondant Advocate R.L. Sukhwal
Case Number: 411
|
Date of Filing: 10-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 16-07-2015
Samsung India Electronics Pvt. Ltd. V/S Manti Ghosh
Court Name: Purba Midnapur
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
...
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 11-03-2014
|
Date of Upload: 13-02-2015
SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PvT Ltd V/S PRAGEN.C
Court Name: Kozhikode
Appelant Advocate ADV.M.SANJEEVAN
Respondant Advocate
CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMCIVIL STATION, KOZHIKODEComplaint Case No. CC/338/20141. PRAGEN.CMOOLACHALIL PARAMBA, OMASSERY THAZHAM, KOVUR MLA ROAD, CHEVAYUR-673017...........Complainant(s)Versus1. SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS PvT LtdA-25,GROUND FLOOR,FRONT TOWER,'MOHAN CO-OPERA...
Case Number: 338
|
Date of Filing: 28-06-2014
|
Date of Upload: 30-11--0001
KALAPI SALCES SAMSUNG TV FREEZ ORTHO DILAR SURENDRANAGAR , SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTRONICS AHMEDABAD V/S ASHOK BHAI PAREKH
Court Name: Surendranagar
Appelant Advocate R. U.JANI
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 15-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2020
Samsung India Electronics Pvt.Ltd V/S Sri Jyoti Prakash Panda
Court Name: Bhadrak
Appelant Advocate In Person
Respondant Advocate Sri G. Das & others
DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUMBHADRAKComplaint Case No. CC/60/2014( Date of Filing : 09 Jul 2014 )1. Sri Jyoti Prakash PandaS/o: Harihar Panda C/o: Dinabandhu Panda, At: Apartibindha, PO/PS:Bhadrak(T) Dist:BhadrakBhadrakOdisha...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Samsung ...
Case Number: 60
|
Date of Filing: 09-07-2014
|
Date of Upload: 23-10-2019
SAMSUNG INDIA ELECTIC PVT. LTD. NEW DELHI , ZEN INFOTEC (SAMSUNG) SURENDRANAGAR , SHAJANI MOBILES JA V/S MAKWANA HITENDRAKUMAR CHIMANLAL
Court Name: Surendranagar
Appelant Advocate
Respondant Advocate
Case Number: 14
|
Date of Filing: 08-10-2014
|
Date of Upload: 18-09-2020
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.
Bhanu Pratap
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)
Bhanu Pratap
Featured RecomendedHighly recommended!
Experties
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Phone Number
7982270319
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.
Common FAQ
Question : Am I eligible to file case against Samsung in Consumer Forum?
Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.
Question : When I can fill a complaint against Samsung ?
Answer : A complaint may be made against Samsung under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.
Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?
Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.
Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?
Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.