company-name-logo

Rto

Latest Judgments

Total 102 Consumer Court Cases Against Rto.

Kerala

Joint RTO V/S T.Abdul Khader

Rto  

Court Name: Kasaragod

Appelant Advocate T.V.Vijayan, Hosdurg

Respondant Advocate

Complaint Case No. CC/11/2381. T.Abdul KhaderS/o.Kutti Haji, R/at H.No.17/330, Kulsu Manzil, Arangadi, Kanhangad.Po.KasaragodKerala...........Complainant(s)Versus1. Joint RTORTO Office, KanhangadKasaragodKerala2. The District CollectorCivil lines,Vidyanagar.Po.KasaragodKerala.......

Case Number: 11

|

Date of Filing: 20-09-2011

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Madhya Pradesh

RTO Hoshangabad V/S Dileep Ahirwar

Rto  

Court Name: Hoshangabad

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 223

|

Date of Filing: 05-10-2010

|

Date of Upload: 18-02-2016

Maharashtra

Pradeshik Parivahan Adhikari, RTO Office V/S Sagar Girish Wasule

Rto  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPUR.District Consumer Forum, 5th Floor, New Administrative Building, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001Complaint Case No. CC/09/789 1. Sagar Girish WasuleNagpurMaharastra ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Pradeshik Parivahan Adhikari, RTO Of...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 22-12-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

Pradeshik Parivahav Adhikari, RTO V/S Makarand Harish Pandit

Rto  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPUR.District Consumer Forum, 5th Floor, New Administrative Building, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001Complaint Case No. CC/09/790 1. Makarand Harish PanditNagpur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. Pradeshik Parivahav Adhikari, RTONagpur ......

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 22-12-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Maharashtra

RTO Office, Nagpur V/S Dhiraj Domaji Gaidhane

Rto  

Court Name: Nagpur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, NAGPUR.District Consumer Forum, 5th Floor, New Administrative Building, Civil Lines, Nagpur-440 001Complaint Case No. CC/09/740 1. Dhiraj Domaji GaidhaneNagpur ...........Appellant(s)Versus.1. RTO Office, NagpurNagpur ...........Respond...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 02-12-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

Padmanabhan V/S The RTO

Rto  

Court Name: StateCommission

Appelant Advocate S.Vijayakumaran

Respondant Advocate

First Appeal No. A/10/263(Arisen out of Order Dated 16/02/2010 in Case No. CC 01/2009 of District Palakkad) 1. The RTO ...........Appellant(s)Versus1. Padmanabhan ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE :HONARABLE MR. JUSTICE SHRI.K.R.UDAYABHANU PRESIDENT PRESENT : ORDER KERALA STATE CO...

Case Number: 10

|

Date of Filing: 21-05-2010

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

The Branch Manager, Sriram Transport Finance Companny ltd., Kannur Branch, Opp RTO Office, Kannur Dt V/S A.T. Velayudhan Nair, Bhavana, Chola, Pattannur P.O., Kannur Dt.

Transport   Finance   Finance   Rto  

Court Name: Kannur

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

In The Consumer Disputes Redressal ForumKannurCONSUMER CASE NO. 09 of 54 1. A.T. Velayudhan Nair, Bhavana, Chola, Pattannur P.O., Kannur Dt.A.T. Velayudhan Nair, Bhavana, Chola, Pattannur P.O., Kannur Dt. ...........Respondent(s) For the Appellant : For the Respondent :Dated : ...

Case Number: 9

|

Date of Filing: 20-02-2009

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

Kerala

RTO Tvpm V/S Kumaran Nair J

Rto  

Court Name: Thiruvananthapuram

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

ThiruvananthapuramConsumer Disputes Redressal Forum,Vazhuthacaudconsumer case(CC) No. CC/08/104 Kumaran Nair J ...........Appellant(s)Vs.RTO TvpmManager, Honda ActivaManager Two Wheeler, ...........Respondent(s) BEFORE:1. Smt. Beena Kumari. A 2. Smt. S.K.Sreela 3. Sri G. Sivapras...

Case Number: 8

|

Date of Filing: 20-05-2008

|

Date of Upload: 30-11--0001

West Bengal

The RTO Cooch Behar V/S Bappa Dutta

Rto  

Court Name: Cooch Behar

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 7

|

Date of Filing: 08-06-2007

|

Date of Upload: 19-06-2018

Gujarat

RTO V/S Abdul Digora

Rto  

Court Name: Rajkot

Appelant Advocate

Respondant Advocate

Case Number: 95

|

Date of Filing: 01-12-1995

|

Date of Upload: 01-10-2020

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.

Common FAQ

Question : Am I eligible to file case against Rto in Consumer Forum?

Answer : If you have purchased a product or avails any service, either for your personal use or to earn your livelihood by means of self-employment.

Question : When I can fill a complaint against Rto ?

Answer : A complaint may be made against Rto under the following circumstances:
1 : Loss or damage is caused to the consumer due to unfair or restrictive trade practice.
2 : the article purchased by you is defective.
3 : the services availed of by you suffer from any deficiency.
4 : charged more then MRP
5 : Goods or services, which will be hazardous to life and safety, when used, are being offered for sale to the public.

Question : Is there any exemption from payment of Court Fee?

Answer : The complainants who are Below the Poverty Line shall be entitled for the exemption of payment of fee for complaints upto rupees one lakh on production of an attested copy of the Antyodaya Anna Yojana card.

Question : What are the Reliefs available to Consumers?

Answer : The reliefs available are :
1 : Removal of defects from the goods
2 : Replacement of the goods
3 : Refund of the price paid.
4 : Removal of defects or deficiencies in the services
5 : Award of compensation for the loss or injury suffered;
6 : Discontinue and not to repeat unfair trade practice or restrictive trade practice;
7 : To withdraw hazardous goods from being offered for sale;
8 : To cease manufacture of hazardous goods and desist from offering services which are hazardous in nature;
9 : If the loss or injury has been suffered by a large number of consumers who are not identifiable conveniently, to pay such sum (not less than 5% of the value of such defective goods or services provided) which shall be determined by the forum;
10 : To issue corrective advertisement to neutralize the effect of misleading advertisement;
11 : To provide adequate costs to parties.